Euripides Manipulation Of The Myth - amazonia.fiocruz.br

Euripides Manipulation Of The Myth Video

Preview [A Table of Contents follows below. This volume consists of twelve articles written in English, Italian, and German, treating works from the Archaic Greek period to Late Antiquity.

The authors tackle the issue of political influence on the image of cities and city-states and how this interaction transformed or altered canonical associations with certain cities, such as Thebes, in the common imaginaire of their societies. Their purpose is an interesting one that deserves commendation and is successful for most of the book.

Angela Ganter starts things of by teasing out interesting questions surrounding the changing image of Thebes in the poetic and theatrical works of the Archaic and Classical period. In the earlier poetry, such as the Homeric works, a picture emerges of the city as an impenetrable fortress, whereas that Euripdies later devolves into a stereotype of a polis wrecked by stasis, infighting, and bad decision-making.

The transformation pictured by Ganter is a convincing one, but certain aspects could have been fleshed out more. Meyer meanders through vase painting, the votive depository from the Acropolis, and literary works of the mid-sixth century Myhh the end of the fifth to figure out how the depiction of Athena and her roles changed.

From Euripides Manipulation Of The Myth more localised, mothering figure, she was transformed into a figure whose roles tie in with the Panhellenic pantheon. It is a wonderful investigation and a rewarding read. Meyer shows how the Athenians themselves altered their views of the goddess as a result of changing fortunes.

Yet the article employs a Euripides Manipulation Of The Myth, inward reflection, which contrasts with the other contributions.

Navigation menu

She demonstrates that Argive rhetoric was deceitful and defied clear communication. Interestingly, as Zetzmann points out, the language used by both poleis is similar; yet the terms used by Athenians reflect the judicial processes in the city at that time. Performance also played a significant role in rhetoric.

It was not just the strongest argument, but also its delivery that mattered in Athens. This part of the article is convincing. This claim comes at the end of the article and could have been fleshed out more if the play constitutes such an open commentary on the recent alliance.

Both human and divine actions cast the city into despair. Part of the blame lies with Athena—and indirectly Athens—but there is a glimpse of hope: the younger generation embodied by Menoeceus. Euripides Manipulation Of The Myth takes the rightful course by putting polis before family and brings peace to Thebes. The play echoes the contemporary situation at Athens, and Euripides may have hoped that the younger Athenian generation would bring stability after the civil wars. The play seems to be set in Thebes, but in reality, it is set in Athens.

source The interaction between the play and the Athena Nike frieze—depicting the sacrifice of a bull or ox—is Mwnipulation, since Buhl argues that Euripides annuls the importance of self-sacrifice because of its ultimate futility.

The implementation of Freudian insights is interesting, but in my opinion did not propel the argument any further, as it was strong enough without it. His oriental background is emphasised more, an oblique Euripidean accusation aimed at Thebes—according to Castiglioni—during the final stages of the Peloponnesian War, when the Persian King got involved.]