Navigation menu
In the United Statesthe school-to-prison pipeline SPPalso known as the school-to-prison link, school-prison nexus, or the schoolhouse-to-jailhouse trackis the disproportionate Criminal Behavior And The Justice System of minors and young adults from disadvantaged backgrounds to become incarcerated because of increasingly harsh school and municipal policies, as well as because of educational inequality in the United States. Many experts have credited factors such as school disturbance lawszero tolerance policies and practicesand an increase in police in schools in creating the pipeline. In recent years, many have started using the term "school-prison nexus" in place of "school-to-prison pipeline" to challenge the idea of a unidirectional pipeline that begins in schools in order to show that 'schools work within a web of institutions, policies, and practices that funnel black youth into prisons. What's more, depending on where you attend school, it no longer operates as a "pathway" to prison but instead a de facto prison.
The current sociopolitical climate, relating to mass incarceration in the United States and calls for decarcerationserves as a critical component in increasing the contact the incarceration system has with the United States education system, as patterns of criminalization translate into the school context.
This results from patterns of discipline in schools mirroring law enforcement models. The disciplinary policies and practices that create an environment for the United States school-to-prison link to occur disproportionately affect disabled, Latino and Black students which is later reflected in the rates of incarceration.
Between andthe percentage of black students being suspended has increased by twelve percent, while the percentage of white students being suspended has declined since the implementation of zero tolerance policies. For the half-century prior to the incarceration rate in the U. Enough Systrm the changes listed here as possible drivers of the "school-to-prison pipeline" occurred during the last quarter of the twentieth century and may have been large enough to explain this increase.
Any Criminzl since that might contribute to this phenomenon are either too minor to have such a macro effect or were too recent to be reflected in these numbers yet. Exclusionary disciplinary policies, specifically zero tolerance policies, that remove students from the school environment increase the probability of a youth coming into contact with the incarceration system. Approximately 3. This number has nearly doubled sincewith rates escalating in the mids as zero tolerance policies began to be widely adopted.
Rising rates of the use of expulsion and suspension are not connected to higher rates of misbehaviors. Research is increasingly beginning to examine the connections between school failure and later contact with the criminal justice system for minorities.
According to the American Civil Liberties Union, "Students suspended or expelled for a discretionary violation are nearly 3 times more likely to be in contact with the juvenile justice system the following year. From tothe number of people incarcerated in the United States quadrupled from roughlyto 2. School disciplinary policies disproportionately affect Black and Latino youth in the education system [14] [ clarification needed ] [ citation needed ] a practice known as the discipline gap. This discipline gap is also connected to the achievement gap. The U. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights issued a brief in outlining the current disparities.
Black students are suspended and expelled at a rate three times greater than white students.]
One thought on “Criminal Behavior And The Justice System”