The Time of Imperialism for the Americas - amazonia.fiocruz.br

When it was learned in that Russia may have hacked the emails of John Podesta and the DNC, and passed the fruits on or WikiLeaks to aid candidate Donald Trump, mighty was the outrage of the American establishment. If Russia's security services filched those emails, and a troll farm in Saint Petersburg sent tweets and texts to stir up rancor in our politics, it was said, this was an attack on American democracy and its most sacred of rituals -- the elections by which we chose our leaders.

Almost all agreed it was intolerable interference in the internal affairs of the United States which called forth both condemnation and retribution. Yet, when it comes to interfering in the affairs of other nations, how sinless, how blameless, are we Americans? During the Cold War, the United States regularly dumped over regimes we believed imperiled our cause -- Iran inGuatemala inthe Congo in the s. After the Cold War, the United States was a major mover in the "color revolutions" that changed regimes in Ukraine and Georgia.

This was the triggering event that caused Vladimir Putin to annex Crimea to secure his country's Black Sea naval base at Sevastopol. Consider the reaction in this capital to the arrest and imprisonment of dissident Alexei Navalny, following his return from Germany, where he had been treated for chemical poisoning, allegedly by Putin's security services.

Putin's autocracy survive and grow Putin has dedicated himself to exploiting the weaknesses in democratic systems. Now is the time to return the favor. The U. How, one wonders, would Americans react if Putin openly urged worldwide support for the "Stop the Steal" mob that invaded the U. Capitol to overturn the results of the Nov. Though Imperilism are divided over racial, cultural, social and moral issues, liberal interventionists still talk of our "universal values" that represent the future toward which all nations should aspire.

Beyond the Smoke & Mirrors

Among these are the values of democracy as practiced in the United States. These are the standards by which other nations are to be judged. And nations that do not conform to these standards are candidates for U. Ours is an ideological imperialism of a rare order. Where did we Americans acquire the right to intervene in the internal affairs of nations -- be they autocracies, monarchies or republics -- that do not threaten or attack us?

Navigation menu

When we have intervened in these nations militarily, disaster has most often been the result. It was partly because the regimes of Libya, Syria, Iraq and Yemen did not comport to our ideas of good governance that we went https://amazonia.fiocruz.br/scdp/essay/mormon-bank-utah/use-of-upper-atmospheric-density-models.php militarily to change them. Result: millions of dead, wounded and displaced Arabs and Muslims all across the Middle East.

A historic calamity. When the Arab Spring arose, we embraced it. The democratic revolution was here!

Forgot password?

And what happened in the largest Arab nation that responded as we insisted, Egypt? An ally of 30 years, President Hosni Mubarak, was ousted. The Muslim Brotherhood was voted into power. It was replaced a year later by a new general, Abdel Fattah el-Sissi, a man more ruthless than Mubarak. This week, the generals in Myanmar Burma ousted the civilian leadership of the country and assumed full power. President Joe Biden reacted reflexively, calling it a "direct assault on the country's transition to democracy. Derek Mitchell of the National Democratic Institute, a subsidiary of the National Endowment for Democracy, explained: "Democracy is one of the pillars of the Biden Administration's foreign policy agenda.

They recognize they have to address this pretty seriously. The question is what to do.]