The Paradox Of Sustainable Development - amazonia.fiocruz.br

The Paradox Of Sustainable Development

The Paradox Of Sustainable Development - apologise

Venetians made their choice in the September elections and went for the quick-money option — but due to climate change and the legacy of the virus that may not be straightforward. The Covid emergency caused the economic foundations of Venice — its tourists — to drop away so rapidly that thoughts quickly turned to what happens next. Would the shake-up open doors to a new sustainable future or would Venice just bounce back to the way things were, a route to degradation, but with the money taps turned back on? On the face of it Venice has gone for the quick-money option — but due to climate change and the legacy of the virus that may not be straightforward. Venetians made their choice in the September elections. The centre-left opposition promised a more sustainable tourism, but the incumbent, right-wing businessman-entrepreneur Mayor Luigi Brugnaro, promised a return to boom and his constituency went for it. Acqua alta and Covid have changed things. In the s historical Venice still had some economic resilience, with local shops focused on the community and a good number of businesses independent of tourism. The Paradox Of Sustainable Development

The Paradox Of Sustainable Development Video

Andrew Grant: Navigating the Innovation Race Paradox- for Sustainable Innovation (Keynote-2)

Sociology of Development 29 September ; 6 3 : — An extensive literature is dedicated The Paradox Of Sustainable Development examining the proliferation of private sector-led, market-based approaches to address gender inequality. Drawing on insights from feminist environmentalism and environmental sociology, I explore how and why this phenomenon is connected to the environmental crisis. I highlight the organization's role in entrenching a neoliberal discourse of women's empowerment that erases socio-ecological contexts. Finally, I present the Exxon Mobil's Foundation's gender portfolio to illustrate how exclusive networks and non-participatory program evaluations have been used by private sector actors to normalize an understanding of women's wellbeing that is devoid of environmental considerations. Together, these cases illustrate how feminist ideals have been used to support elite economic agendas with high environmental costs, while also marginalizing those who seek sustainable development through systemic reform.

This phenomenon exacerbates an environmental crisis that disproportionately affects the people these programs purport to empower.

Systematic Review ARTICLE

Sign In or Create an Account. User Tools. Sign In. Skip Nav Destination Article Navigation. Close mobile search navigation Article navigation.

The Paradox Of Sustainable Development

Volume 6, Issue 3. Previous Article Next Article. Article Navigation. Research Article September 29 This Site.

Newsletter

Google Scholar. Sociology of Development 6 3 : — Views Icon Views. Get Permissions. Cite Icon Cite. You do not currently have access to this content. View full article. Sign in Don't already have an account? Client Account. You could not be signed in. Sign In Reset password.

Sign in via your Institution Sign in via your Institution. Citing articles via Google Scholar. Email alerts Article Activity Alert. Latest Issue Alert.]

The Paradox Of Sustainable Development

One thought on “The Paradox Of Sustainable Development

  1. In my opinion you commit an error. I can defend the position.

  2. You are right, in it something is. I thank for the information, can, I too can help you something?

  3. I congratulate, it seems magnificent idea to me is

  4. You have hit the mark. I like this thought, I completely with you agree.

Add comment

Your e-mail won't be published. Mandatory fields *