The Globalization Paradox By Dani Rodrik - amazonia.fiocruz.br

The Globalization Paradox By Dani Rodrik Video

Foreign Policy. Expand Collapse. Date of placement In some cases, this impulse arises from mostly benevolent aims: The leaders of some country genuinely believe that spreading through force, if necessary their ideals and institutions to others will genuinely benefit the recipients. Defensive motives may also be operating: A state may believe that it cannot be reliably secure unless other countries have similar if not identical institutions. Of course, such claims may simply be a reassuring story that ruling elites propagate to justify aggressive actions undertaken for more selfish Globalziation.

Whatever the motivation, if their efforts were successful the world would gradually converge on a single Teh for political, economic, and social life. Individual national variations would be modest and declining in importance, limited to purely local concerns such as national holidays, cuisine, preferred musical styles, etc. In theory, even some of these features might begin to lose their individual features over time. Thus far, the only political form that has commanded nearly universal global acceptance is the territorial state itself, along with the closely related idea of nationalism.

Bottom panel for Description

As Hendrik SpruytStephen KrasnerDan Nexonand others have explored, the territorial state was only one of several political forms coexisting in early modern Europe, and its eventual emergence as the dominant political form was a contentious process that might have turned out differently. Many factors contributed to its ultimate success, and one of them was the idea of sovereignty: the principle that every government got to run its own affairs as its rulers or, eventually, its citizens saw fit.

And once that principle took firm hold, individual local variations were reinforced and entrenched. Add to this notion the emerging idea of nationalism—the belief that different groups of people have distinct identities based on language, culture, shared history, etc. As John Mearsheimer argues in The Great Delusionnations want their own state so that they can protect themselves in an insecure world, and states often encourage nationalism in order to unify the population and enhance state power. The gradual spread of these twin ideas—nationalism and sovereignty—has had far-reaching if uneven effects.

Nationalism undermined and eventually destroyed the Spanish, Portugeuse, British, French, Belgian, Ottoman, Austro-Hungarian, and Soviet empires, and decolonization eventually swelled the United Nations from its original odd members to nearly states today. In this way, the territorial state became the dominant political form in the contemporary world, but the The Globalization Paradox By Dani Rodrik content within each state still varied enormously.

Growth Of The Slave Trade

Democracies, monarchies, oligarchies, one-party authoritarians, military dictators, religious regimes, etc. Throughout this process, a number of countries have at one time or another seen themselves as models for the rest, and they have tried in various ways to convince others to adopt their formula. The leaders of revolutionary France sought to topple foreign monarchs and spread liberty to Europe and beyond, and Napoleon subsequently tried to impose his own order on the countries he had conquered. Soviet Russia was explicitly committed to spreading its particular form of socialism, and pan-Arabists, Nasserites, and assorted Islamic fundamentalists have sought to convince or coerce others into adopting their preferred model within the Arab and Islamic world. Not surprisingly, in the unipolar era the United Read more increasingly The Globalization Paradox By Dani Rodrik a one-size-fits-all approach to other countries.

Foreign countries may still have been regarded as formally sovereign, but the United States increasingly sought to influence if not dictate some of their national policy decisions. In the military realm, states that sought weapons of mass destruction were sanctioned, ostracized, attacked, or overthrown, even as U. The goal, as President George W. Lastly, as my colleague Dani Rodrik argues convincinglyU. Whether in the form of the s Washington Consensus or trade agreements like the stillborn Trans-Pacific Partnership, a world with fewer barriers to the movement https://amazonia.fiocruz.br/scdp/blog/culture-and-selfaeesteem/emily-dickinson-s-amazing-gifts-as-a.php goods, people, or capital left The Globalization Paradox By Dani Rodrik governments less able to chart their own course or insulate their populations from global market forces.

The past 15 years has not been kind to this ambitious vision of a world increasingly united by shared values and similar institutions.]