At Risk vs Vulnerable Populations - think, what
The boreal woodland caribou Rangifer tarandus caribou , also known as woodland caribou , boreal forest caribou and forest-dwelling caribou , is a North American subspecies of the reindeer or the caribou in North America with the vast majority of animals in Canada. Unlike the Porcupine caribou and barren-ground caribou , boreal woodland caribou are primarily, but not always, sedentary. The boreal woodland caribou is the largest of the caribou subspecies [5] [6] and is darker [7] in colour than the barren-ground caribou. They prefer lichen-rich mature forests [9] and mainly live in marshes, bogs, lakes and river regions. The historic range of the boreal woodland caribou covered over half of present-day Canada, [3] stretching from Alaska to Newfoundland and Labrador. The national meta-population of this sedentary boreal ecotype spans the boreal forest from the Northwest Territories to Labrador but not Newfoundland. Their former range stretched south into the United States. There are no longer any boreal woodland caribou in New England , Minnesota, Idaho, Wisconsin or Michigan and only several dozen in Washington. Environment Canada , b. New forest growth following destruction of vegetation provides habitat and food for other ungulates, which in turn attracts more predators, putting pressure on woodland caribou. At Risk vs Vulnerable Populations
This page has At Risk vs Vulnerable Populations number of charts on the pandemic. In the box below you can select any country you are interested in — or several, if you want to compare countries. To understand the risks and respond appropriately we would also want to know the mortality risk of COVID — the likelihood that someone who catches the disease will die from it.
We look into this question in more detail here and explain that this requires us to know — or estimate — the number of total cases and the final number of deaths for a given infected population. Because these are not known, we discuss what the current data can and can not tell us about the risk of death here.
Navigation menu
By now you know that in these charts it is always possible Vulnegable switch to any other country in the world by choosing Change Country in the bottom left corner. You can sort the table by any of the columns by here on the column header. How do the total number of confirmed deaths and cases compare? See them plotted against each other. The case fatality rate is the number of confirmed deaths divided by the number of confirmed cases. During an outbreak — and especially when the total number of cases is not known — one has to be very careful in interpreting At Risk vs Vulnerable Populations CFR. There is a straightforward question that most people would like answered.
Here we explain why that is. One, it relies on the number of confirmed cases, and many cases are not confirmed; Vulnerablw At Risk vs Vulnerable Populations, it relies on the total number of deaths, and with COVID, some people who are sick and will die soon have not yet died.
These two facts mean that it is extremely difficult to make accurate estimates of the true risk of death. But this is not the same as the risk of death for an infected person — even though, unfortunately, journalists often suggest that it is. It is relevant and important, but far from the whole story. The CFR is very easy to calculate. You take the number of people who have died, and you divide it by the total number of people diagnosed with the disease. That means that it is not the same as — and, in fast-moving situations like COVID, probably not even very close to — the true risk for an infected person. Another important metric, which should not be confused with the CFR, is the crude mortality rate. The crude mortality rate — sometimes called the crude death rate — measures the probability that any individual in the population will more info from the disease; not just those who are infected, or are confirmed as being infected.
This difference is important: unfortunately, people sometimes confuse case fatality rates with crude death rates. A common example is the Spanish flu pandemic in Vulnrable estimate, by Johnson and Muelleris that that pandemic At Risk vs Vulnerable Populations 50 million people.
This means the crude mortality rate was 2. But 2. If the crude mortality Risl really was 2. Remember the question we asked at the beginning: if someone is infected with COVID, how likely is it that they will die? The answer to that question is captured by the infection fatality rateor IFR.
The IFR is the number of deaths from a disease divided by the total number of cases. To work out the IFR, we need two numbers: the total number of cases and the total number of deaths.
We may be able to estimate the total number Vulnerbale cases and use it to calculate the IFR — and researchers do this. But the total number of cases is not known, so the IFR cannot be accurately calculated. This means that the CFR can decrease or increase over time, as responses change; and that it can vary by location and by the characteristics of the infected population, such as age, or sex. You can see that in the earliest stages of the outbreak the CFR was much higher: But in Vulnrable weeks that followed, the CFR declined, reaching as low as 0. You can also see that the CFR was different in different places. When we talk about the CFR of a disease, we need to talk about it in a specific time and place — the CFR in Wuhan on 23rd February, or in At Risk vs Vulnerable Populations on 4th March — rather than as a single unchanging value.
If the case fatality rate does not tell us the risk of death for someone infected with the disease, what does it tell us?]
One thought on “At Risk vs Vulnerable Populations”