Is Animal Testing Wrong - amazonia.fiocruz.br

Is Animal Testing Wrong Video

Animal testingalso known as animal experimentationanimal research and in vivo testingis the use of non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study.

Essay on why animal testing is wrong

This approach can be contrasted with field studies in which animals are observed in their natural environments or habitats. Experimental research with animals is usually conducted in universities, medical schools, pharmaceutical companies, defense establishments and commercial facilities that provide animal-testing services to industry. Examples of applied research include testing disease treatments, breeding, Is Animal Testing Wrong research and toxicologyincluding cosmetics testing. In education, animal testing is sometimes a component of biology or psychology courses. The practice is regulated to varying degrees in different countries. It is estimated Is Animal Testing Wrong the annual use of vertebrate animals—from zebrafish to non-human primates —ranges from tens to more than million. By one estimate the number of mice and rats used in the United States alone in was 80 million. Most animals are euthanized after being used in an experiment.

The terms animal testing, animal experimentation, animal researchin vivo testing, and vivisection have similar denotations but different connotations. Literally, "vivisection" means "live sectioning" of an animal, and historically referred only Ia experiments that involved the dissection of live animals. The earliest references to animal testing are found in the writings of the Greeks in the 2nd and 4th centuries BC. Aristotle and Erasistratus were among the first to perform experiments on living animals. Testijg have repeatedly been used through the history of biomedical research.

Inthe founders of the Dublin Zoo were members of the medical profession who were interested in studying animals while they were alive and when they were dead. In the s, Ivan Pavlov famously used dogs to describe classical conditioning.

Between andthe Germans infected mules in Argentina bound for American forces, resulting in the death of mules. In the s, antibiotic treatments and vaccines for leprosy were developed using armadillos, [31] then given to humans. Toxicology testing became important in the 20th century. In the 19th century, Animall regulating drugs were more relaxed.

Navigation menu

For example, in the US, the government could only ban a drug after a company had been prosecuted for selling products that harmed customers. However, in response to the Elixir Sulfanilamide Testong of in which the Is Animal Testing Wrong drug killed more than users, the US Congress passed laws that required safety testing of drugs on animals before they could be marketed. Other countries enacted similar legislation. As the experimentation on animals increased, especially the practice of vivisection, so did criticism and controversy. Inthe advocate of Galenic physiology Edmund O'Meara said that "the miserable torture of vivisection places the body in an unnatural state". There were also objections on an ethical basis, contending that the benefit to humans did not justify the harm Testint animals.

On the other side of the debate, those in favor of animal testing held that experiments on animals were necessary to advance medical and biological knowledge.]