Computer Surveillance The Legal Realm Public Perception - amazonia.fiocruz.br

Computer Surveillance The Legal Realm Public Perception Computer Surveillance The Legal Realm Public Perception

Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information, on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient. Governments [5] and private organizations may engage in censorship.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Other groups or institutions may propose and petition for censorship. General censorship occurs in a variety of different media, including speech, books, music, films, and other arts, the press, radio, television, and the Internet for a variety of claimed reasons including national securityto control obscenitychild pornographyand hate speechto protect children or other vulnerable groups, to promote or restrict political or religious views, and to prevent slander and libel.

Computer Surveillance The Legal Realm Public Perception

Direct censorship may or may not be legal, depending on the type, location, and content. Many countries provide strong protections against censorship by law, but none of these protections are absolute and frequently a claim of necessity to balance Compurer rights is made, in order to determine what could and could not be censored. There are no laws against self-censorship.

Computer Surveillance The Legal Realm Public Perception

In BC, Greek philosopher, Socrateswhile defying attempts by the Greek Bowlby Attachment Theory to censor his philosophical teachings, was accused of collateral charges related to the corruption of Athenian youth and sentenced to death by drinking a poison, hemlock. The details of Socrates's conviction are recorded by Plato as follows. Socrates' student, Platois said to have advocated censorship in his essay on The Republicwhich opposed the existence of democracy.

InSweden became the first country to abolish censorship by law. Censorship has been criticized throughout history for being unfair and hindering progress. In a essay on Internet censorship, social commentator Michael Landier claims that censorship is counterproductive as it prevents the censored topic from being discussed. Landier expands his argument by claiming that those who impose censorship must consider what they censor to be true, as individuals believing themselves to be correct would welcome the opportunity to disprove those with opposing views. Censorship is often used to impose moral values on society, as in the censorship of material considered obscene.

English novelist E. Forster was a staunch opponent of censoring material on the grounds that it was obscene or immoral, raising the issue of Computer Surveillance The Legal Realm Public Perception subjectivity and the constant changing of moral values.

The Common Of Computer Surveillance Essay

When the novel Lady Chatterley's Lover was put on trial in RRealm, Forster wrote: [17]. Lady Chatterley's Lover is a literary work of importance I do not think that it could be held obscene, but am in a difficulty here, for the reason that I have never been able to follow the legal definition of obscenity. The law tells me that obscenity may click and corrupt, but as far as I know, it offers no definition of depravity or corruption. Proponents have sought to justify it using different rationales for various types of information censored:.

Computer Surveillance The Legal Realm Public Perception

In wartime, explicit censorship is carried out with the intent of preventing the release of information that might be useful to an enemy. Typically it involves keeping times or locations secret, or delaying the release of information e.]

One thought on “Computer Surveillance The Legal Realm Public Perception

  1. You are definitely right

  2. In it something is. Many thanks for the information. It is very glad.

  3. It is remarkable, very valuable idea

Add comment

Your e-mail won't be published. Mandatory fields *