The Mass Media and Foreign Policy - amazonia.fiocruz.br

The Mass Media and Foreign Policy Video

Doesn't: The Mass Media and Foreign Policy

Media cross-ownership is the common ownership of multiple media sources by a single person or corporate entity.

Menu: Top Buttons

In the United States, a recent increase in media merging and concentration of ownership has correlated with a decrease in trust in mass media. Much of the debate over concentration of media ownership in the United States has for many years focused specifically on the ownership of broadcast stations, cable stations, newspapers and websites. Over time, both the number of media outlets and concentration of ownership have increased, translating to fewer companies owning more media outlets. Thf List of assets owned by WarnerMedia. See: List of assets owned by Disney.

View collection by:

Also known as " Big Tech ," a collection of six major digital media companies are also noted for their strong influence over their respective industries:. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution included a provision that protected "freedom of the press" from Congressional action.

For newspapers and other print items, in which the medium itself was practically infinite and publishers could produce as many publications as they wanted without interfering with any other publisher's ability to do the same, this was not a problem. The debut of radio broadcasting in the first The Mass Media and Foreign Policy of the 20th century complicated matters; the radio spectrum is finite, and only a limited number of broadcasters could use the medium at the same here. The United States government opted to declare the entire broadcast spectrum to be government property and license the rights to use the spectrum to broadcasters.

After several years of experimental broadcast licensing, the United States licensed its first commercial radio station, KDKAin Prior topublic airwaves in the United States were regulated by the United States Department of Commerce and largely litigated in the courts as the growing number of stations fought for space in the burgeoning industry. The Communications Act of was the stepping stone for all of the Thf rules that are in place today.

Download & Read Online PDF Book-Curtis Booher

The FCC was given authority by Congress to give out licenses to companies to use the broadcasting spectrum. However, they had to determine whether the license would serve "the public interest, convenience, and necessity".

A debated concept, the term "public interest" was provided with a general definition by the Federal Radio Commission. The Commission determined, in its annual report, that "the emphasis must be first and foremost on the interest, the convenience, and the necessity of the listening public, and not on the interest, convenience, or necessity of the individual broadcaster or the advertiser. The view read more that the public would benefit from a diverse array of owners because it would lead to a diverse array of program and service viewpoints. The Communications Act of refined and expanded on the authority of the FCC to regulate public airwaves in the United States, combining and reorganizing provisions from the Federal Radio Act of and the Mann-Elkins Act of ]