Ontological Argument On The Existence Of God - amazonia.fiocruz.br

Ontological Argument On The Existence Of God Video

The Arguments for God's Existence Tier List

Ontological Argument On The Existence Of God - all became

I used to study philosophy. In a class on the philosophy of religion, we studied several arguments for the existence of God. One that I could never get into was proposed by St. Anselm of Canterbury in and became known as the ontological argument. My professor set it to the tune of Waltzing Matilda. Ontological Argument On The Existence Of God

Navigation menu

Abstract: Anselms's Ontological Argument is stated, and a few standard objections to his argument are listed. Anselm, "Ontological Argument" Philosophy of Religion.

Introduction to Philosophy Anselm's "Ontological Argument" Abstract: Anselms's Ontological Argument is stated, and a few standard objections to his argument are listed. Anselm of Canterbury was a Neoplatonic Realist and was often called "the second Augustine.

Other existent things in the world are emanations from archetypes. The general idea of the ontological argument is based on the notion that the concept of Ontological Argument On The Existence Of God as the greatest being implies that God exists—if not, there could be something greater, namely an existent Ontoloigcal being—but this being would be God.

The structure of the Ontological Argument can be outlined as follows The argument is based on Anselm's Proslogion 2 : We conceive of God as a being than which no greater can be conceived. This being than which no greater can be conceived either exists in the mind alone or both in the mind and in reality. Assume that this being than which no greater can be conceived exists in the mind alone. Existing both in the mind and in reality is greater than existing solely in the mind. This being, existing in the Exietence alone, can also be conceived to exist in reality.

This being existing in the mind alone is not therefore the being than which no greater can be conceived. See statement 1 above.

Therefore, this being than which no greater can be conceived exists in reality as well as exists in the mind. Some standard objections to the Ontological Argument are listed below. References to the formal logical background given below can be safely omitted by the introductory student. The Perfect Island Objection : Gaunilo argues that the concept of a perfect island does not thereby prove the existence of an island.

Philosophy of Religion

Perfection in this case does not imply "existence. Cf, the strategy of analogical refutations in syllogistic logic at Refutation by Means of Devising a Logical Analogy. The important logical point is that true premises and a false conclusion can never occur in a valid argument. If we can construct a similar argument to a given argument with the same form as the original with true premisses and a false conclusion, then the given argument is also shown https://amazonia.fiocruz.br/scdp/blog/culture-and-selfaeesteem/charcot-marie-tooth-disorder.php be invalid.

Anselm's Reply: There is no contradiction in denying the existence of a perfect island, but there is in denying God's existence. Anselm notes the only way God can Ontological Argument On The Existence Of God conceived Argumdnt not to exist is to conceive of the word "God" not existing since this kind of perfection implies existence. Note: it's difficult to phrase Anslem's objection without circularity— cf, the informal fallacy of petitio principii. The "Fool's Objection" : Anselm's definition of God as " the being than which no greater can be conceived" is impossible to understand—there is Ontological Argument On The Existence Of God clear and distinct idea of a "being than which no greater can be conceived.

Anselm's Reply: If one does not understand the definition, then one is a fool. You cannot argue with a fool. Anselm here can be charged with committing the fallacy of Ontoloyical hominem. Anselm believes that one must suppose a minimum of intelligence in anyone considering the argument—but, of course, the burden of proof in this regard is on Anselm.

Cfthe related ideas of the prinicple of charity and the argumentum ad ignorantiam Objection of "Existence is not a Predicate" :In the consideration of any idea one cannot get outside of the conception to reality; Anselm's argument compares the conception of existing in the mind with the conception of existing in reality. Yet, an argument can only deal with concepts, not existent things in the external world. As Immanuel Kant Ontoogical, one cannot compare the value of the idea of thalers i.

We assume existence in our conversation and arguments—we do not prove existence. Consider this case: One doesn't laud someone you are to marry to your folks, and the add, "Oh by the way, that person really exists.]