The Threats of Cross Site Request Forgery - amazonia.fiocruz.br

The Threats of Cross Site Request Forgery - more detail

Imagine this scenario: after logging into your bank account and checking your balance, you navigate to another website. Suddenly, you notice your account was hijacked! Funds are being transferred and the attacker tries to reset your password. You are security-conscious and never fall for phishing scams or share your password, so how could this have happened? XSRF is a common web-security exploit that even tech giants like Google, Netflix, and Microsoft have proven susceptible to in the past. You visit the website of an attacker, and that website makes your browser send requests on your behalf. They might manipulate your data, or have your browser perform unwanted actions for you, like resetting your password, changing your email, or purchasing a virtual item. Because your browser includes your cookies and session information with the request, the web server will trust the request and perform what is asked. This is a flaw that has existed since the early days of the Internet. A number of solutions have been developed around validating the referrer or origin header, but they do not work in all cases.

The Threats of Cross Site Request Forgery Video

CSRF Tutorial - A Guide to Better Understand and Defend Against Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) The Threats of Cross Site Request Forgery

XSRF at Roblox

The table s below shows the weaknesses and high level categories that are related to this weakness. These relationships are defined as ChildOf, ParentOf, MemberOf and give insight to similar items that may exist at higher and lower levels of abstraction.

In addition, relationships such as PeerOf and CanAlsoBe are defined to show similar weaknesses that the user may want to explore. The different Modes of Introduction provide information about how and when this weakness may be introduced. The Phase identifies a point in the life cycle at which introduction may occur, while the Read article provides a typical scenario related Cros introduction during the given phase.

Your Answer

Class: Language-Independent Undetermined Prevalence. The table below specifies different individual consequences associated with the weakness.

The Scope identifies the application security area that is violated, while the Impact describes the negative technical impact that arises if an adversary succeeds in exploiting this weakness. The Likelihood provides information about how likely the specific consequence is expected to be seen relative to the other consequences in the list.

For example, there may be high likelihood that a weakness will be exploited to achieve a certain impact, but a low likelihood that it will be exploited to achieve a different impact. This example PHP code attempts to secure the form The Threats of Cross Site Request Forgery process by validating that the user submitting the form has a valid session. A CSRF attack would not be prevented by this countermeasure because the attacker forges a request through the user's web browser in which The Threats of Cross Site Request Forgery valid session already exists. This code may look protected since it checks for a valid session. However, CSRF attacks can be staged from virtually any tag or HTML construct, including image tags, links, embed or object tags, or other attributes that load background images. The attacker can then host code that will silently change the username and email address of any Genetic Modifications For Unborn Children that visits the page while remaining logged in to the target web application.

The code might be an innocent-looking web page such as:. Notice how the form contains hidden fields, so when it is loaded into the browser, the user will not notice it. Because SendAttack is defined in the body's onload attribute, it will be automatically called when the victim loads the web page. Assuming that the user is already logged in to victim. At this stage, the user's identity has been compromised, and messages sent through this profile could be sent to the attacker's address.

The Threats of Cross-Site Request Forgery and Cross-Site Scripting

Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Use the "double-submitted cookie" method as described by Felten and Zeller:. When a user visits a site, the site should generate a pseudorandom value and set it as ov cookie on the user's machine. The site should require every form submission to include this value as a form value and also as a cookie value. When a POST request is sent to the site, the request should only be considered valid if go here form value and the cookie value are the same.

You are here

Because of the same-origin policy, an attacker cannot read or modify the value stored in the cookie. To successfully submit a form on behalf of the user, the attacker would have to correctly guess the pseudorandom value.

If the pseudorandom value is cryptographically strong, this will be prohibitively difficult. This technique requires Javascript, so it may not work for browsers that have Javascript disabled. This weakness can be detected using tools and techniques that require manual human analysis, such as penetration testing, threat modeling, and interactive tools that allow the tester to record and modify an active session. Specifically, manual analysis can be useful for finding this weakness, and for minimizing false positives assuming an understanding of business logic. However, it might not achieve desired code coverage within limited time constraints. For black-box analysis, if credentials are not known for privileged accounts, then the most security-critical portions of the application may not receive sufficient attention.]