Milgram Experiment What Was The Intent - amazonia.fiocruz.br

Milgram Experiment What Was The Intent Video

Opinion: Milgram Experiment What Was The Intent

In Marcha documentary by Christopher Nick titled The game of death has held millions of viewers in France 2.

Navigation menu

Will a candidate for the game accept, on the order of a scientist, to send increasingly strong electric shocks to another candidate, unknown to himable to lead him to death? What do we learn from this well-known experience in social psychology?

That individuals are ready to blindly Exprriment the injunctions of an authority, particularly a scientific one, and thus submit to its will. A researcher in social psychology at Yale University, Stanley Milgram conducted between and a laboratory experiment whose objective was to assess the influence that a scientist, in other words an expert in his field, can exert on behavior.

The final results are published in a landmark book: Obedience to authority Milgram Experiment What Was The Intent An accomplice of Stanley Milgram finds himself in the situation of an individual who must memorize a list of word associations. If he is wrong, he receives from the recruited volunteer an electric shock of course artificialwhich can go up to Exleriment, while a scientist expert in a white coat, also an accomplice, supervises the experiment.

Milgram: measuring the power of authority and its limits

The results are terrifying: despite the pleas of the accomplice imploring the end of the experiment when the feigned pain is unbearable, in two thirds of the cases, the volunteer goes to the end of the experiment, encouraged by the scientist expertand inflicts without qualms Expegiment shock of volts to the accomplice. Particularly attention is drawn to variant Concretely, the volunteer is confronted with the totally contradictory points of view of two legitimate powers: a first scientist refuses to continue the experiment for ethical reasons the suffering expressed by the accomplicewhile the second scientist maintains that he is necessary to continue it at all costs. The results obtained are then particularly interesting.

From individuals.

About this entry

It can also help us understand the seditious tendencies of mayors who have authorized by decree the illegal opening of all businesses in their municipality or the more casual, even transgressive behavior observed during this second confinement. It would suffice to convince oneself of the ambient cacophony to stand for three days in front of one of the aforementioned TV channels.

The succession of contradictory opinions of medical experts, but also political Wbat, makes you dizzy and creates extreme confusion given the major disagreements expressed, on the most suitable means of protection, on the vectors of contamination, on the use of some treatments, on the effective implementation of physical distancing, in short on almost everything. Consequently, the words of the experts were durably contested, and the result could only be an outright rejection of the collective rules of the game.

Is a hairdresser who receives clients in drops really an inducer of contagion? In any case, everyone affirms that they participate little, if at all, in the second wave, reinforced by the critical voice of such and such a scientist or such self-proclaimed expert. Like the volunteers of the Stanley Milgram experiment who had stopped their participation in the experiment in the presence of two scientists with diametrically opposed opinions.]