Reflection On The Field Of Organizational Psychology - amazonia.fiocruz.br

What necessary: Reflection On The Field Of Organizational Psychology

The paper addresses the epistemological and theoretical Pychology that underpin the concept of Work and Organizational Psychology as idiographic, situated, and transformative social science. Positioning the connection between uniqueness and generalization inside the debate around organization studies as applied approaches, the contribution highlights the ontological, gnoseological, and methodological implications at stake.

The use of practical instead of scientific rationality is explored, through the perspective of a hermeneutic lens, underlining the main features connected to the adoption of an Reflection On The Field Of Organizational Psychology of practice. Specifically, the contribution depicts the configuration of the applied research as a relational practice, embedded in the unfolding process of generating knowledge more info with concrete social contexts and particular social objects.

The discussion of a case study regarding a field research project allows one to point out challenges and constraints connected to the enactment of the research process as a social accomplishment. Whatever the considerations relating to the consistency of such comments and the necessary humility expected by each author in accepting Thf and suggestions to improve a submitted work, at stake here are implicit and taken-for-granted concepts about understanding research, science, and the relationship between scientific knowledge and practical knowledge — even more so as the reference of the special issue is not to psychology Psychplogy general but to the specific field of Work and Organizational Psychology WOP.

The paper addresses the epistemological and theoretical assumptions associated with the need to go beyond the linearity of theory application, moving from the content of knowledge to the locally acknowledged use s of knowledge. We position the matching between uniqueness and generalization inside the debate around organization studies as applied science and the sought connection between theory and practice. The aim of the paper is to support a research perspective oriented at Reflection On The Field Of Organizational Psychology relevant knowledge by working with — and not on — people Shotter, and by confronting with problems that cross the lives of real organizations. Psycgology answer the research questions, we address and develop the contributions regarding the adoption of practical instead of scientific rationality Tsoukas, ; Sandberg and Tsoukas, ; Shotter and Tsoukas,seeking to bridge the gap between theory and practice that hinders applied social sciences.

The paper unfolds as follows. We begin by exploring the epistemology of WOP as an idiographic and applied science, addressing the socially constructed nature of the phenomena under consideration. In this perspective, uniqueness and generalization deal with research issues generated by problems of real organizational action, negotiated in social and tangible scenarios that contribute to determining the objects of study Bartunek et al. Thereafter, we point out the most relevant implications addressing the ontological, gnoseological, methodological, and practical dimensions at stake. We then discuss a case study related to an on-the-field research project, highlighting the relational aspects embedded in the unfolding process of generating knowledge within a concrete social context, the actors involved and their representation of the object whose demarcation is not immediately obviousand the ways to access local and situated knowledge connected to the experience of people involved.

Navigation menu

Finally, we conclude by synthesizing the elements that allow defining such type of research as situatedtransformativeand relationalsuggesting hints for further research. As an applied scienceWOP is routed in a postmodern trajectory Kvale, ; Gergen,and overcomes a prescriptive and routinized approach to conduct research, having been revised or even upset through the last decades of debates about the linguistic turn Wittgenstein,the narrative turn Bruner,; Sarbin, ; Polkingorne,the practice turn Schatzki et al.

A different perspective of research emerges, one that can help people engaged in actual organizational contexts cope with processes of learning on the fields, connecting action and thought and trying to open new visions not yet available for transforming and improving their daily Psycbology.

Such an approach is capable of relaunching check this out promoting the genuinely practical and applied hearth of the discipline, as required to answer to the challenges produced by the crisis in complex and unstable organizational contexts. Being inspired by a dialogical and transformative perspective Cunliffe and Scaratti,we call for a relational research approach in the WOP field, highlighting both the epistemological assumptions and the methodological options that are consistent to such perspective, as well as the issues concerning the validity and common criteria for good practice in such relational and transformational process-oriented research.

We draw on a hermeneutic lens Bernstein, ; Dreyfus, ; Smith, that moves from phenomenology through social representations to semiotic, focusing on knowledge as structurally connected to the experiences lived by subjects, their contexts of reference lebenswelt and the meanings they share in Reflection On The Field Of Organizational Psychology.

Hence, there is a need to legitimize the existence of a plurality of scientific paradigms, as it is possible to formulate knowledge in distinct ways and, therefore, to attribute certain properties and relationships to the universe of objects considered. Thinking of WOP as an idiographic and applied science entails the assumption of an epistemological position, seeking for the validity of a situated approach in a specific field of psychological research and intervention.

Reflection paper on psychology

We claim the concept of validity to be intertwined with social validation and acknowledgement: A research or intervention process is valid if its relevance is recognized by the actors that collaborated to Reflection On The Field Of Organizational Psychology knowledge and if it is coherent with the conventional Organixational shared inside a scientific community. At stake, since the focus of the special issue is about critical perspectives on replicability in WOP research, are the uniqueness of idiographic studies in this specific field, their validity beyond the boundary of a specific case, and how and in which sense particular findings coming from an ethnographical design or case study can be generalized.

Tsoukas addresses the epistemic significance of the particular : It relies on the possibility to enrich the general concepts Psjchology to the issue under study since the situational uniqueness of specific phenomena provides analytical refinement of what is currently known. As highlighted by Wittgensteinthe commonality among https://amazonia.fiocruz.br/scdp/essay/is-lafayette-a-hidden-ivy/the-prevalence-of-human-trafficking.php phenomena does not refer to a specific analytical definition or single features but depends on family resemblances connected to the possible multiple usages of their related concepts.

Hence, the relationship here general and particular touches upon a heuristic generalization that allows a better understanding of the phenomena at hand, putting in dialogue thick descriptions and available accounts in their uniqueness and idiosyncrasy with theoretical frameworks at stake.

Conceptual Analysis ARTICLE

The potential of generating knowledge from idiosyncratic reality is embedded in the unicity of each case study, since its situated original configuration provides a portrait of the world Shotter and Tsoukas, ; Scaratti,allowing the researcher to highlight different repertoires perhaps new but anyway interesting ones. For this reason, Tsoukasp. The deepness, density, and thickness of the particular, detected and depicted in its situated configuration, open both vertical connection with many different conceptual interpretations of the phenomena and horizontal extensions plural ethnographical accounts and perspectives through which the phenomena can be seen.]