Organizational Knowledge Theory And Practice - amazonia.fiocruz.br

Theme: Organizational Knowledge Theory And Practice

Organizational Knowledge Theory And Practice Video

The paper addresses the epistemological and theoretical assumptions that underpin the concept of Work and Organizational Psychology as idiographic, situated, and transformative social science. Positioning the connection between uniqueness and generalization inside the debate around organization studies as applied approaches, the contribution highlights the ontological, gnoseological, and methodological implications at stake.

The use of practical instead of scientific rationality is explored, through the perspective of a hermeneutic lens, underlining the main features connected to the adoption of an Theiry of practice. Specifically, the contribution depicts the configuration of the applied research as a relational practice, embedded in the unfolding process of generating knowledge dealing with concrete social contexts and particular social objects.

The discussion of a case study regarding a field research project allows one to point out challenges and constraints connected to the enactment of the research process Organizational Knowledge Theory And Practice a social accomplishment.

Link the considerations relating to the consistency of such comments and the necessary humility expected by each author in accepting criticisms and suggestions to improve a submitted work, at stake here are implicit and taken-for-granted concepts Pracice understanding research, science, and the relationship between scientific knowledge and practical knowledge — even more so as the reference of the special issue is not to psychology in general but to the specific field of Work and Organizational Psychology WOP.

The paper addresses the epistemological and theoretical assumptions associated with the need to go beyond the linearity of theory application, moving from the content of knowledge to the locally acknowledged use s of knowledge.

Navigation menu

We position the matching between uniqueness and generalization inside the debate around organization studies as applied science and the sought connection between theory and practice. The aim of the paper is to support a research perspective oriented at producing relevant knowledge by working with — and not on — people Shotter, and by confronting with problems that cross the lives of real organizations.

To answer the research questions, we address and develop the contributions regarding the adoption of practical instead of scientific rationality Organizational Knowledge Theory And Practice, ; Sandberg and Tsoukas, ; Shotter and Tsoukas,seeking to bridge the gap between theory and practice that hinders applied social sciences.

The paper unfolds as follows.

We begin by exploring the epistemology of WOP as an idiographic and applied science, addressing the socially constructed nature Organizational Knowledge Theory And Practice the phenomena under consideration. In this perspective, uniqueness and generalization deal with research issues generated by problems of real organizational action, negotiated in social and tangible scenarios that contribute to determining the objects of study Bartunek et al. Thereafter, we point out nAd most relevant implications addressing the ontological, gnoseological, methodological, and practical dimensions at stake. We then discuss a case study related to an on-the-field research project, highlighting the relational aspects embedded in the unfolding process of generating knowledge within a concrete social context, the actors involved and their representation of the object whose demarcation is not immediately obviousand the ways to access local and situated knowledge connected to the experience of people involved.

Finally, we conclude by synthesizing the elements that allow defining such type of research as situatedtransformativeand relationalsuggesting hints for further research. As an applied scienceWOP is routed in a postmodern trajectory Kvale, ; Gergen,and overcomes a prescriptive and Organizational Knowledge Theory And Practice approach to conduct research, having been revised or even Knowledgr through the last decades of debates about the linguistic turn Wittgenstein,the narrative turn Bruner,; Sarbin, ; Polkingorne,the practice turn Schatzki et al.

Conceptual Analysis ARTICLE

A different perspective of research emerges, one that can help people engaged in actual organizational contexts cope with processes of learning on the fields, connecting action and thought and trying to open new visions not yet available for transforming and improving their daily practices. Such an approach is capable of relaunching and promoting the genuinely practical and applied hearth of the discipline, as required article source answer to the challenges produced by the crisis in complex and unstable organizational contexts.

Being inspired by a dialogical and transformative perspective Cunliffe and Scaratti,we call for a relational research approach in the WOP field, highlighting both the epistemological assumptions and the methodological options that are consistent to such perspective, as well Organizational Knowledge Theory And Practice the issues concerning the validity and common criteria for good practice in such relational and transformational process-oriented research.

We draw on a hermeneutic lens Bernstein, ; Dreyfus, ; Smith, that moves from phenomenology through social representations to semiotic, focusing on knowledge as structurally connected to the experiences lived by subjects, their contexts of reference lebenswelt and the Organizatinal they share in them. Hence, there is a need to legitimize the existence of a plurality of scientific paradigms, as it is possible to formulate knowledge in distinct ways and, therefore, to attribute certain properties and relationships to the universe of objects considered.]