To browse Academia. Skip to main content. By using our site, you agree to our collection of information through the use of cookies. To learn more, view our Privacy Policy. Log In Sign Up. Paul A. Unfollow Follow Unblock. Other Psychollogy. Rethinking History, vol.
In order to pay homage to Hayden White's life work 5 months after his passing we knew that what was needed-and what he himself would have wanted-was a vibrant intellectual exchange.
Navigation menu
We took this opportunity Psychology Is A Less Undisciplined gathering scholars who represent different parts of the world, different cultures and approaches to reflect on White's ideas in a global context. Our interest was in discussing how his work has been read and used or even misread and misused and how it has influenced theoretical discussions in different parts of the globe.
Rather than just offering an account as experts, we mainly wanted to reflect on the current state of our field and the ways that White's inheritance might and should be carried forward in the future. Doi: The End of Histories? Alex Rosenberg's latest book purports to establish that narrative history cannot have any epistemic value.
Rosenberg argues not for the replacement of narrative history by something more science-like, but rather the end of histories Rosenberg argues not for the replacement of narrative history by something more science-like, but rather the end of histories understood as an account of human doings under a certain description. This review critiques three of his main arguments: 1 narrative history must root its explanations in folk psychology, 2 there are no beliefs nor desires guiding human action, and 3 historical narratives are morally and ethically pernicious. Rosenberg's book reprises themes about action explanation he first rehearsed 40 years ago, albeit with neuroscience rather than sociobiology Psychology Is A Less Undisciplined "preempting" explanations that trade on folk psychological notions. Although Rosenberg's argument strategy has not altered, the review develops a number of reasons as to why his approach now lacks any plausibility as a strategy for explaining histories, much less a successful one.
The Philosophical Structure of Historical Explanation more. Roth sets for himself an audacious task: the revival of philosophy of history and a recalibration of how to understand and account for historical explanation. Roth succeeds and with Roth succeeds and with surgical precision offers a new account of narrative historical explanation that holds its own https://amazonia.fiocruz.br/scdp/essay/is-lafayette-a-hidden-ivy/temperament-characteristics-of-child-development.php epistemological and metaphysical factors and yet also aligns with other forms of scientific knowledge.
It is an erudite and original work that is essential reading for all scholars invested in understanding our relation to the past and the ways that the histories we write come to impact our present and future. Roth develops an argument that resolves disputes persisting since the nineteenth century about the scientific status of history.
He does this by showing why historical explanations must take the form of a narrative, making their logic explicit, and revealing how the rational evaluation of narrative explanation becomes possible. The book also develops a nonrealist irrealist metaphysics and epistemology of history-that is, it argues that there exists no one fixed past, but many pasts. It includes a novel reading of Thomas S. Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, displaying how Kuhn offers a narrative explanation of theory change in science.
And it situates narrative explanations within a naturalistic framework. The first four chapters defuse methodological and metaphysical objections to narrative explanations.
The final three chapters explore how narrative explanations relate to other sciences. This book will be of interest to researchers in historiography, philosophy of history, philosophy of science, philosophy of social science, and epistemology. Who Are We? Reflections on Edward Weisband's The Macabresque more. HistoriographyExplanationand Holocaust and Genocide Studies.]
It is an amusing piece