Impact of Diversity on Public Policies - amazonia.fiocruz.br

Impact of Diversity on Public Policies - can

You may also wish to look for examples of an Executive Summary on the Internet. You may use the health care setting in which you currently work or have worked in the past. Describe the type of organization and region. For example: A major Midwestern teaching hospital or a rehabilitation hospital on the East Coast. Do not report the name of the facility. The city in which you work has undergone a significant population shift within the last 10 years, due to increased employment, education opportunities, and an influx of immigrants and refugees. To put the population shift in perspective, the local school district enrollment report states that nearly languages are spoken in the schools, up from 32 languages in the last census. Senior leadership has asked you to examine all types of multiculturalism and diversity within your health care organization. Impact of Diversity on Public Policies.

Home Initiatives.

diversity and inclusion policies in the workplace

An article by our member Antonella Succurro opens up a debate on gender-bias within the evaluation of scientific careers. An article published on November 17 in Nature Communications states it loud and clear: having a woman as a mentor harms your Pollcies career. After a massive uproar of the scientific community on social mediathe article is since November 19 under investigation for retraction. And I want to make it clear — I am Diiversity writing this out of resentment because I feel offended by the conclusions, I write this because the scientific process behind the research presented there is flawed. The following summary is not exhaustive, but is a starting point. Sophia Frentz will not more info inclusive of non-binary and trans-gender click. With the recent news that journals will allow scientists who transitioned to retroactively change their name on publicationsthis shortcoming in the article Impact of Diversity on Public Policies a total disconnect from the societal context of the topics the authors are investigating.

You would expect that Impact of Diversity on Public Policies scientist making an extraordinary claim on diversity policies would at least be familiar with the current on-going debates. Female scientists, in fact, may benefit from opposite-gender mentorships in terms of their publication potential and impact throughout their post-mentorship careers. Policy makers should thus revisit first and second order consequences of diversity policies while focusing not only on retaining women in science, but also on maximizing their long-term scientific impact. So the authors are basically suggesting to revisit diversity policies based on their results. This is both a systemic and systematic bias.

InsteadI see a lot of methodological problems, detailed in the next section. Three out of four reviewers raised relevant red flags which should have prevented the manuscript from being published with its current claims. Two out of four remain adamant after the first round of review that the article should not be published with certain content. Mixing-up co-authorship with mentorship is a long stretch and completely unjustified, as pointed out by the reviewers very strongly.

The details of the survey are available in the Supplementary Material and I find https://amazonia.fiocruz.br/scdp/essay/pathetic-fallacy-examples/the-use-of-corporal-punishment-in-schools.php authors did a very poor design choice for it. In addition Impact of Diversity on Public Policies the poor design, the reported statistics are not impressive and leave serious doubts on the sampling reliability. Yet they claim in the title and in the main manuscript that they investigate informal mentorship.

Which brings me to the next point of discussion. The authors had in principle a decent work in place, analyzing millions of co-authorships to understand the impact of scientific collaborations, something always useful to get more insights on the current scientific performance measures which, we all know, have to be improved. I can only guess, but I can think that they needed very badly to present their work as novel enough to make it into a high impact factor journal and controversial enough to gain lots of citations later on. Looks like the academic reward system is encouraging such kind of behavior, and it is deeply sad.

Share your recommendations

In the next few weeks, we will start drafting a document directed at regional and international organizations on "inclusion". If you believe we should include recommendations on which you have worked of that you know of, contact us. Diversity and Inclusion Policies Actions Evidence based debates and policies. Addressing General Policy. Why we started a task force on gender and diversity policies in science and not only An article by our member Antonella Succurro opens up a debate on gender-bias within the evaluation of scientific careers. First Name. Last Name. Share your recommendations. General Comment on Science - Official version and monitoring activities Right to science.]