Analysis Of The Stonewall
More Discovered than Reported
These claims have led to much Analysis Of The Stonewall in the paleoanthropology community. A partial left femur TM was Stoewall in July at Toros-Menalla, Chad, at the same fossiliferous location as the late Miocene holotype of Sahelanthropus tchadensis the cranium TM Based on our more info, the TM partial femur lacks any feature consistent with regular bouts of terrestrial bipedal travel; instead, its gross morphology suggests a derived Pan-like bauplan. The researchers found a femur, or thigh bone, along with two ulnas, or forearm bones, that would help clarify the matter, but they published nothing about them for almost two decades, prompting criticism from colleagues.
Why did it take so long for the femur to be described? Later, Bergeret-Medina was unable to find the femur. Neither she nor Macchiarelli ever saw it again. What happened to the femur?
How you can get involved
This is good. Perhaps if they have the actual bones their study will shed more light on the facts. Perhaps if they share the bones with other researchers even more light will be shed. One hopes that time will tell. So where does all of this leave us?
As the technical paper put it: A partial left femur TM was recovered in July at Toros-Menalla, Chad, at the same fossiliferous location as the late Miocene holotype of Sahelanthropus tchadensis the cranium TM Did Rivals Stonewall Publication?]
One thought on “Analysis Of The Stonewall”