A New York Times Op Ed Article - the phrase
How fast the times have changed! Fair Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U. Section , the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. A New York Times Op Ed Article
The author was described as a senior official working for the administration of U. About a week before the presidential electionMiles Taylorthe former chief of staff to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsenrevealed himself as the author.
Navigation menu
The op-ed criticizes Trump and states that many current members of the administration deliberately undermine his suggestions and orders for the good of the country. It also states that some cabinet members in the early days of the administration discussed using the Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution as a way to remove the president from power.
The New York Times editorial board said that it knew the author's identity but granted the person anonymity to protect him from reprisal. A Warninga book also anonymously written by Taylor, was published on November 19, The essay was published on September 5, During the week that the article was published, the book Fear: Trump in the White House by political author Bob Woodward was being promoted in the media ahead of its September 11,release date.
Most Read Blog Articles
Woodward's book depicts the Trump administration as being engulfed in chaos and internal opposition to Trump's impulses. This timing was also two months prior to the US elections.
The timing has been questioned as a possible calculated diversion, although The New York Times editorial board denied this. The author of the essay writes that they, and many of their article source, deliberately fail to follow some directives from the president when they feel the proposal would be bad for the country, "working diligently" to block his "worst inclinations". Anyone who works with him knows he is not moored to any discernible first principles that guide his decision making".
It's the work of the steady state. There was much speculation about the identity of Anonymous. The New York Times said that they were working oYrk a single author, not a group of officials and that the text was lightly edited by them, but not for the purpose of obscuring the author's identity. They said that the definition of " senior administration official " was used in regular practice by journalists to describe "positions in the upper echelon of an administration, such as the one held by this writer". The newspaper's editorial page editor, op-ed editor, and publisher knew the identity of the author. Patrick Healy, the newspaper's Aryicle editor, said that no identifying information had been leaked to The New York Times 's newsroom. The agreement between the newspaper's editorial department and the author did not prevent the newspaper's news department from investigating the identity of A New York Times Op Ed Article author.
According to James OOp, the paper's editorial page editor, the author was introduced to them by a trusted intermediary, and the author's identity was verified by background checking and direct communication. Dao said the use of a vaguely described anonymous identity was believed to be necessary to protect the author from reprisal, "and that concern has been borne out by the president's reaction to the essay".
Latest Postings
Several theories about who wrote the op-ed were offered. Some theories looked at which administration officials have a record of using certain words that appear in the essay. Specifically, the theories focused on the use of the words 'steady state', 'lodestar' and 'first principles'. More than 30 senior administration officials, including Artice actual author, Miles Taylor, denied authoring the editorial:. Presidential advisers did consider polygraph exams as well as requiring officials to sign sworn affidavits.
Reports surfaced that the administration came up with a list of about a dozen people who are suspected to have authored the editorial. However, the Justice Department would only be able to open an investigation if it is determined that the editorial publicized classified information.
On October 28,Miles Taylor came Yoro as "Anonymous". Trump reacted in private with what was described as "volcanic" anger.
Ronnie Vincent’s Journey
White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders called the link a "coward" and said that they should resign. Representative Jimmy Gomez D- Calif. Georgetown University political scientist Elizabeth N. Saunders noted that while it is accurate that staff within administrations often push back on the sitting president's views and that staff leak things to the press, the extent to which senior advisers within the Trump administration push back against him is "essentially unprecedented".]
Today I read on this question much.