The Comparison of the Road and Into - amazonia.fiocruz.br

Agree: The Comparison of the Road and Into

Navigation menu

A metaphor is a figure of speech that, for rhetorical effect, directly refers to one thing by mentioning another. Metaphors are often compared with other types of figurative language, such as antithesishyperbolemetonymy and simile. All the world's a stage, And all the men and women merely players; They have their exits and their entrances This quotation expresses a metaphor because the world is not literally a stage and humans are not literally actors and actresses playing roles. By asserting that the world is a stage, Shakespeare uses points The Comparison of the Road and Into comparison between the world and a stage to convey an understanding about the mechanics of the world and the behavior of the people within it. According to the linguist Anatoly Liberman"the use of metaphors is relatively late in the modern European languages; it is, in principle, a post-Renaissance phenomenon".

Secondary Navigation

He is like a tree planted by streams of water, yielding its https://amazonia.fiocruz.br/scdp/essay/is-lafayette-a-hidden-ivy/socrates-downfall-of-socrates.php in season, whose leaf does not wither.

The Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want. At the other extreme, some recent linguistic theories view all language in essence as metaphorical. The Philosophy of Rhetoric by rhetorician I. Richards describes a metaphor as having two parts: the tenor and the vehicle. The tenor is the subject to which attributes are ascribed. The vehicle is the object whose ajd are borrowed.

Coronavirus (COVID-19)

In the previous example, "the Compafison is compared to a stage, describing it with the attributes of "the stage"; "the world" is the tenor, and "a stage" is the vehicle; "men and women" is the secondary tenor, and "players" is the secondary vehicle. Other writers [ which? Cognitive linguistics uses the terms 'target' and 'source', respectively. Psychologist Julian Jaynes coined the terms 'metaphrand' and 'metaphier', plus two new concepts, 'paraphrand' and 'paraphier'.

In a simple metaphor, an obvious attribute of the metaphier exactly characterizes the metaphrand e. With an inexact metaphor, however, a metaphier might have associated attributes or nuances — its paraphiers — that enrich the metaphor because they "project back" to the metaphrand, potentially creating new ideas The Comparison of the Road and Into the paraphrands — associated thereafter with the metaphrand or even leading to a new metaphor.

For example, in the metaphor "Pat is a tornado", the metaphrand is "Pat", the metaphier is "tornado". As metaphier, "tornado" carries paraphiers such as power, storm and wind, counterclockwise motion, and danger, threat, destruction, etc.

The metaphoric meaning of "tornado" is inexact: pf might understand that 'Pat is powerfully destructive' through the paraphrand of physical and emotional destruction; another person might understand the metaphor as 'Pat can spin out of control'. In the latter case, the paraphier of 'spinning motion' has become the paraphrand 'psychological spin', suggesting an entirely new metaphor for emotional unpredictability, a possibly apt description for a human being hardly applicable to a tornado.

Based on his analysis, Jaynes claims that metaphors link only enhance description, but "increase enormously our powers of perception Metaphors are most frequently compared with similes.

It is said, for instance, that Compaarison metaphor is 'a condensed analogy' or 'analogical fusion' or that they 'operate in a similar fashion' or are 'based on the same mental process' or yet that 'the basic processes of analogy are at work in metaphor'. It is also pointed out that 'a border between metaphor and analogy is fuzzy' and 'the difference between them might be described metaphorically as the distance between things being compared'. A metaphor asserts the objects in the comparison are identical on the point of comparison, while a simile merely asserts a similarity through use of words such as "like" or "as". For this reason a common-type metaphor is generally considered more forceful than a simile.]