Analysis Of Kolodny And Velleman On Love - amazonia.fiocruz.br

Analysis Of Kolodny And Velleman On Love Video

Thank for: Analysis Of Kolodny And Velleman On Love

Ratings and Reviews

Sign in Create an account. Syntax Advanced Search. Options 1 filter applied. Export this page: Choose a format.

Menu principal

Sign in to use this feature. Logic and Philosophy of Logic. Model Theory in Logic and Philosophy of Logic. Direct download 4 more. Areas of Mathematics in Philosophy of Mathematics. Direct download 3 more.

Results for 'Francçoise Point'

Continental Philosophy. Phenomenology in Continental Philosophy.

Direct download 2 more. What does the idea of taking 'the point of view of the universe' tell us about ethics?

Lazari-Radek and Singer defend objectivism in ethics, and hedonistic utilitarianism, following Henry Sidgwick's lead. They explore how to justify an ethical theory; conflicts of self-interest and universal benevolence; and whether we should discount the future. Henry Sidgwick in 19th Century Philosophy. In this article I explain Ot cognitive science including some neuroscience matters for normative ethics. First, I describe the dual-process theory of moral judgment and briefly summarize the evidence supporting it. Next I describe related experimental research examining influences on intuitive moral judgment. I then describe two ways in which research along these lines can have implications for ethics. I argue that a deeper understanding of moral psychology favors certain forms of consequentialism over other classes of normative moral https://amazonia.fiocruz.br/scdp/essay/perception-checking-examples/dicore-case-study.php.

Moral Judgment, Misc in Meta-Ethics. Neuroscience of Ethics in Normative Ethics. Psychology of Ethics in Normative Ethics.

Shop by category

Direct Analysis Of Kolodny And Velleman On Love 5 more. Abstract Why should we love the people we do and why does love motivate us to act as it does? In this paper, I explore the idea that these questions can be answered by appealing to the idea that love has to do with close personal relationships the relationship claim. Niko Kolodny has already developed a relationship theory of love: according to Kolodny, love centres on the belief that the subject shares a valuable personal relationship with the beloved. I shall develop an alternative account, discarding the assumption that love centres on a belief, and beginning instead from a conception of love as an emotional attitude, which, I suggest, involves a form of evaluation that is not belief. As I explain, adopting this view allows us to interpret the relationship claim, not as a claim about the subject?

This Om allows us to answer the questions above, while avoiding the difficulties Anlysis confront Kolodny's account. I end by exploring a case that might be thought to raise some difficulties for my account. Emotion and Reason in Philosophy of Mind. Objects and Contents of Emotions in Philosophy of Mind.]