Analysis Of Jean Valjean s Les Miserables - amazonia.fiocruz.br

Analysis Of Jean Valjean s Les Miserables Video

Victor Hugo's novel of early 19th Century France, as told through the experiences of the ex-convict, Jean Valjean. Classics Illustrated tells this wonderful tale in colorful comic strip form, providing an excellent introduction for younger readers. Also includes theme discussions and study questions. Rachel Jackson — Jun 24, Les Miserables was one of those books that sat on my bookshelf for years untouched, not because I didn't want to read it, but because I was intimidated to. I even knew that author Victor Hugo himself wanted to publicize it and glorify it before its publication, hinting at its reputation as a classic masterpiece. Somehow, thoug Les Miserables was one of those books that sat on my bookshelf for years untouched, not because I didn't want to read it, but because I was intimidated to.

Related products

Somehow, though, it was a book I never knew the ending to, despite it being talked about all over the Internet. When I did get a chance to finally read it but not the edition listed hereI Analysis Of Jean Valjean s Les Miserables more confused than anything — not about the story but why it's so deified. The book wanders back and forth, up and down, with a sometimes disconnected and pedantic plot. At times it's incredibly interesting, with a backstory and philosophical impact that leaves you thinking about poverty and abandonment more than you did before.

And the way Hugo managed to weave everyone's stories into one life in 19th century France was done very well also; I never felt that the connections between the characters were forced. As a whole, though, the entire text is a slow read.

Navigation menu

Even the most exciting of action scenes e. The story wheedles often. Hugo also inserts far too many digressions about poverty, war, fate, history, war, French culture, etc. I felt the book would have been more effective if Hugo had perhaps published those "essays" separately, as a complement to the book so readers could focus more easily on only the story of Jean Valjean. Speaking of which, he wasn't even introduced in the book until page The first chunk was devoted to the godliness and righteousness of a bishop who doesn't even stay alive long after that. It was as if Hugo wanted everyone to know he was Analysis Of Jean Valjean s Les Miserables and a good writer: he name-dropped like crazy and referenced historical events ranging from biblical times to the "future" of what Analysis Of Jean Valjean s Les Miserables happening in the main plot of the book.

Is it a classic masterpiece, then? I'm divided. On the one hand, the historical epic within it is indeed remarkable, and I found myself hooked at numerous points in the book. The unknown fate of Jean Valjean was the reason I remained eager to keep reading, and I tried to apply Hugo's musings on life and philosophy to the sections they preceded or succeeded, especially as Jean Valjean's life was aboard that French roller coaster.

That being said, Jean Valjean's fate was totally underwhelming. The book was built completely up around him, and the last chapters rightly reflect on his whole life, but it seemed rushed and without moral itself — go here the entire rest of the book being about his redemption. Maybe I sort of fell out of love with his character over the lengthy time I knew him, but the end was a letdown. Come to think of it, none of the characters particularly resonated with me in the end.

Sure, I'm a little sad I finished the book, because I often experience some withdrawal after reading a powerful book — and powerful Les Miserables was. But the first three sections were so heartwrenching and depressing that I was able to show some sympathy for the characters. When their fortunes changed and new problems came into their lives, problems that affected everyone, young or old, rich or poor, I no longer had a special place for them reserved in my heart.

It was as if Hugo wanted to create as happy an ending as go here but couldn't find a way to wrap everything up realistically. But I could feel too much of Hugo himself in the novel to really enjoy it; he seemed to shout, through the near-perfect redemption of Jean Valjean, that everyone should read a moral in his story.]