Analysis Of Alexander Hamilton s The Federalist - amazonia.fiocruz.br

Analysis Of Alexander Hamilton s The Federalist Video

Federalist No. It was published on October 27,under the pseudonym Publius. This paper provides the outline for the rest and argues for the inadequacy of the Articles of Confederation.

After the Constitutional Convention ofthe new Constitution was sent to the various states for ratification in September Anti-Federalist essays condemning the document began to surface later that month, quickly followed by the Federalist efforts of Alexander Hamilton, James Madisonand John Jay. The essay is highly critical of the government in place at the time; however, it does not take the form of a diatribe.

Eloquently written, yet manifestly biased, Federalist No. Hamilton is quite aware of his own bias :.

Navigation menu

You will, no doubt, at the same time, have collected from the general scope of them, that [these ideas] proceed from a source not unfriendly to the new Constitution. Yes, my countrymen, I own to you that, after having given it an attentive consideration, I am clearly of opinion it is your interest to adopt it. Hamilton is keenly aware not only of his own bias, but also those of others. In fact, Federalist No. Hamilton writes:. Happy will it be if our choice should be directed by a judicious estimate of our true interests, unperplexed and unbiased by considerations not connected with the public good. But this is a thing more ardently to be wished than seriously to be expected. The investigation of particular types of bias is quite sophisticated.

Hamilton identifies not only those with a venomous bias, but also the plethora of people who, while their intentions are good, exhibit an Analysis Of Alexander Hamilton s The Federalist bias. In fact, he claims even those who believe themselves to be impartial often have hidden biases:. More importantly, the discussion of bias actually introduces a key theme of the Federalist as a whole, the relation of motive and reason in politics.

Hamilton, as Publius, argues that political motives are irrelevant to the truth of arguments made in their behalf. Arguments stand or fall of their own weight and can be neither enhanced nor diminished by knowledge of the motives that gave rise to Analysis Of Alexander Hamilton s The Federalist. The irrelevance of motives to the truth of arguments is one of the main reasons that the authors of these papers chose to use a pseudonym.

Hamilton, predicting the initial Anti-Federalist response would continue, correctly foresaw the US Constitution as a polarizing issue. In reference to those who would oppose the Constitution, he claimed, "A torrent of angry and malignant passions will be let loose. An enlightened zeal for the energy and efficiency of government will be stigmatized as the offspring of a temper fond of despotic power and Alexandfr to the principles of liberty.

This Alexande has proven false, with hardly any discussion about the Papers and the known Anti-Federalist Papers continuing to this day.]