Genetically Modified Crops Should Be Continued - above told
Some of you have opted to give a regular donation. This is greatly appreciated as it helps place us on a more stable financial basis. Thank you for your support! The genetically modified food debate has been reignited after the UK government announced plans to consider loosening regulation on GM crops and animals. Below is an unusually balanced article from the mainstream press on the gene editing deregulation consultation in the UK. Molecular geneticist Dr Michael Antoniou, who has long warned about the risks of genetic modification technologies, is quoted at length. In early January , a consultation was launched that asks whether organisms produced by genetic engineering should continue to be classified as genetically modified, if the organisms could have been developed using traditional breeding methods. Prime Minister Boris Johnson shares a similar view. Gene editing is a relatively new and fast-evolving technology. Views on regulating the use of gene editing in producing genetically modified animals or crops have generally fallen into two camps, says Prof Katherine Denby from the University of York, who works on new ways to improve crops using tools such as gene editing.Genetically Modified Crops Should Be Continued - your
In early January , a consultation was launched that asks whether organisms produced by genetic engineering should continue to be classified as genetically modified, if the organisms could have been developed using traditional breeding methods. Prime Minister Boris Johnson shares a similar view. Gene editing is a relatively new and fast-evolving technology. Views on regulating the use of gene editing in producing genetically modified animals or crops have generally fallen into two camps, says Prof Katherine Denby from the University of York, who works on new ways to improve crops using tools such as gene editing. The second camp holds that any organism made through gene editing should be regulated as a genetically modified organism, regardless of whether the final product could have been made using traditional breeding. Countries such as the US, Australia and Japan have taken the former, more relaxed, approach, while the EU has taken the latter, more stringent one. Current UK regulations mean gene-edited crops can technically come to market, but the regulatory process is both lengthy and extremely costly, says Denby. This, in turn, is prohibiting the development of traits that are for public good, such as disease resistance, she says. Genetically Modified Crops Should Be ContinuedTranscript
In early Januarya consultation was launched that asks whether organisms produced by genetic engineering should continue to be classified as genetically modified, if the organisms could have been developed using traditional breeding methods. Prime Minister Boris Johnson shares a similar view. Gene editing is a relatively new and fast-evolving technology. Views on regulating the use of gene editing in producing genetically modified animals or crops have generally fallen into two camps, says Prof Katherine Contimued from the University of York, who works on new ways to improve crops using tools such as gene Genetically Modified Crops Should Be Continued. The second camp holds that any organism made through gene editing should be regulated as a genetically modified organism, regardless of whether the final product Modigied have been made using traditional breeding.
Countries such as the US, Australia and Japan have taken the former, more relaxed, approach, while the EU has taken the latter, more stringent one.
Gene editing: Should livestock and crops be genetically engineered in the UK?
Current UK regulations mean gene-edited crops can technically come to market, but the regulatory process is both lengthy and extremely costly, says Denby. This, in turn, is prohibiting the development of traits that are for public good, such as disease resistance, she says. Gene editing could potentially offer greater food security for the UK, but are there unseen dangers? For example, her own work aims to replicate the disease resistance found in older and wild relatives of lettuce in more modern varieties, a process that will go many times faster using gene editing rather than traditional breeding. But other scientists are more sceptical about the benefits that gene editing can bring and are concerned about its potential dangers.
Antoniou says gene editing is not as highly precise as is often claimed and can bring about unintended mutations.
Recent Posts
For instance, gene editing could run the risk of producing novel toxins or allergens, or increasing the levels of pre-existing toxins and allergens, especially in plants, he says. But many scientists argue that gene editing is crucial to supporting a more sustainable food system. But for Antoniou the focus really needs to be on the agricultural system as a whole, rather than link individual crops and seeds.
Source link. Your email address will not be published. Close Menu Home.
Viral News. Read more about gene editing: Gene editing is a relatively new and fast-evolving technology. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Terms and Condition Privacy Policy Disclaimer.]
Why also is not present?
Yes, I understand you.