Argument Against Aquinas Cosmological Argument - amazonia.fiocruz.br

Not: Argument Against Aquinas Cosmological Argument

Philosophy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for those interested in the study of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence.

Navigation menu

It only takes a minute to sign up. Unobservable immaterialism are unfalsifiable because they are unobservable and hence not considered.

It just tries to convince, but cannot prove anything. The first part is also questionable.

There are plenty of things where we don't know the cause, can't Arhument it, or there is none radioactivity is spontaneous - while you can argue it has a material cause, there is nothing that triggers decay, it just happens following some statistics.

A lot of things we can't tell if what we see is causation or correlation. I don't want to judge your statements based on logic seems weak here from strict math logicI just want to provide my perspective for your benefit.

Explanation and the Cosmological Argument

Your claim is actually most educated people think, kind of like materialism and empiricism, rejecting the existence of any non-material spirits or Platonic Forms. Well, same large amount of people of most religions will offer you the opposite claim, some may go to extreme and claim "there's nothing but God". Their only difference is how they define the word "exists"! If two equal saints meet and argue about something, most likely u should bet they're both honest, smart and wise guy, just confused about each other's definition.

Calculate the price of your order

This universal confusion caused so many unnecessary conflicts throughout history. The famous "Problem of Universals" in philosophy circle is such an ancient typical conflict, now I think every sensible person will agree there exists a concept called "2" after seeing two seemingly identical things.

While certain math genius may feel "2" more impressively than "pain", and that's why this person can surely outperforms you in solving Math number theory problems By the way, most people will regard math as absolute truth, such as number 2 is real and really exists in some Platonic spiritual world apart from this imperfect material world sounds like dualism here.

But my Argument Against Aquinas Cosmological Argument is contrary, number 2 or any abstract universal concepts resides in the same "metaphoric" realm of human mind, just happen to be located in the relatively most clear-countably-verifiable-universal layer. I don't opine separating the noumena from the phenomena as a serious business, its useful for some purposes, but all these concepts and separations are still man-made fake analogies and stories consciously engineered to explain to a naive Coemological confused child who is actively seeking an authoritative answer from the grown-ups.]