Why The Government Should Restrict Gun Ownership - amazonia.fiocruz.br

Why The Government Should Restrict Gun Ownership - was and

The right to keep and bear arms in the United States is a right, considered by American institutions as a fundamental right [1] [2] [3] protected by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution , part of the Bill of Rights , and by the constitutions of most U. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. In the United States, which has an English common law tradition, the concept of a right to keep and bear arms was recognized prior to the creation of a written national constitution. The American understanding of the right to keep and bear arms was influenced by the English Bill of Rights , an Act of Parliament , which also dealt with personal defence by Protestant English subjects. The Bill of Rights did not create a new right to have arms but rather rescinded and deplored acts of the deposed King James II , a Roman Catholic , who had forced the disarming of Protestants , while arming and deploying armed Catholics contrary to Law among other alleged violations of individual rights. The Bill of Rights provided that Protestants could bear arms for their defence as permitted by law. Why The Government Should Restrict Gun Ownership

Poor people are tricked into thinking that socialism won't benefit them, when they're the ones who'd benefit the most from it.

Basically it's been drilled into their head since Reagan that universal healthcare is the first step on a slippery slope that ends with a re-creation of Stalinist Russia on US soil. It was a scam for money.

For real. So people kept electing the Republicans since they were telling the truth, because the Republican led government obviously didn't work. The Canadian system is far from perfect but ive never met a single person who wanted an American style system to replace it.

Welcome to Reddit,

I don't think it's reviled. Hell I think even the politicians deep down want it. The entire healthcare lobby does not. Plus all the other industries that touch it.

Too much money. Perfect example moderna ceo went out and pumped the vaccine before he sold millions of shares. Did the scc do anything? Did the media say anything?

Want to add to the discussion?

Did a single politician say anything? It's because their lobbiest pay millions. This is not just healthcare. My close family friend is the head lobbiest for a major telco in California.

It's all bullshit. If that confuses you imagine being in a country where we have it and there are people arguing that it should be privatised.]