Why I Should Not Go Into The - confirm
As much as Robinhood contributed to the stock's gains, it's also drawn flak from users, Wall Street and the US government for how it handled the activity. It reversed that decision the next day and posted on its blog about what happened in all that stock trading. In short, regulations required it to have a certain amount of money on hand to cover stock trades, and it simply didn't have enough at the time. While Robinhood users are able to trade stocks of GameStop and other companies with volatile prices, there are still questions about the events of last week, including whether something like that will happen again. We have some answers for the big questions about Robinhood, the actions it took and what might happen next. Robinhood is an investing app that launched in It's popular among millennials, who make up a majority of its users and can conduct a variety of investments for free. Read more about Robinhood here. On the morning of Jan. Why I Should Not Go Into The.Why I Should Not Go Into The Video
NOT Going to College was the BEST Decision of My LifeSholud today, Cloudflare terminated the account of the Daily Stormer. We've stopped proxying their traffic and stopped answering DNS requests for their sites. We've taken measures to ensure that they cannot sign up for Cloudflare's services ever again. Our terms of service reserve the right for us to terminate users of our network at our sole discretion.
Create an account or sign in to comment
The tipping point for us making this decision was that the team behind Daily Stormer made the claim that we were secretly supporters of their ideology. Our team has been thorough and have had thoughtful discussions for years about what the right policy was on hWy. We could not remain neutral after these claims of secret support by Cloudflare.
There are a number of different organizations that work in concert to bring you the Internet. They include:.
The rules and responsibilities Why I Should Not Go Into The each of the organizations above in regulating content Tye and should be different. We've argued that it doesn't make sense to regulate content at the proxy, where Nott provides service, since if we terminate a user the content won't go away it will just be slower and more vulnerable to attack. That's true, and made sense for a long time, but increasingly may not be relevant. The size and scale of the attacks that can now easily be launched online make it such that if you don't have a network like Source in front of your content, and you upset anyone, you will be knocked offline. In fact, in the case of the Daily Stormer, the initial requests we received to terminate their service came from hackers who literally said: "Get out of the way so we can DDoS this site off the Internet.
You, like me, may believe that the Daily Stormer's site is vile. You may believe it should be restricted.
Recommended Posts
You may think the authors of the site should be prosecuted. Reasonable people can and do believe all those things. But having the mechanism of content control be vigilante hackers launching DDoS attacks subverts any rational concept of justice. In a not-so-distant future, if we're not there already, it may be that if you're going to put content on the Internet you'll need to use a company with a giant network like Cloudflare, Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Amazon, or Alibaba. Without a clear framework as a guide for content regulation, a small number of companies will largely determine what can and cannot be online. The issue of who can and cannot be online click often been associated with Freedom of Speech.
We think the more important principle is Due Process. I, personally, believe in strong Freedom of Speech protections, but I also acknowledge that it is a very American idea that is not shared globally. On the other hand, the concept of Due Process is close to universal.
At its most basic, Due Process means that you should be able to know the rules a system will follow if you participate in that system.
What happened last week?
Due Process requires that decisions be public and not arbitrary. It's why we've always said that our policy is to follow the guidance of the law in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Law enforcement, legislators, and courts have the political legitimacy and predictability to make decisions on GGo content should be restricted.]
Quite good question