What I Learned About Buddhism - where
Nor should festivals be held, for Beloved-of-the-Gods, King Piyadasi, sees much to object to in such festivals, although there are some festivals that Beloved-of-the-Gods, King Piyadasi, does approve of. Formerly, in the kitchen of Beloved-of-the-Gods, King Piyadasi, hundreds of thousands of animals were killed every day to make curry. But now with the writing of this Dhamma edict only three creatures, two peacocks and a deer are killed, and the deer not always. And in time, not even these three creatures will be killed. Wherever medical herbs suitable for humans or animals are not available, I have had them imported and grown. Wherever medical roots or fruits are not available I have had them imported and grown. Along roads I have had wells dug and trees planted for the benefit of humans and animals. The Council shall notify the Yuktas about the observance of these instructions in these very words. What I Learned About BuddhismWhat I Learned About Buddhism Video
HOW BUDDHISM CHANGED MY LIFEWhat can we learn from Buddhism? The answer to this question could be nothing or many things; both answers, according to Buddhism, are correct. It is easy to understand that there are many things one can learn from Buddhism.
It is difficult, however, to comprehend that there is nothing one Learner learn. The very reason you came here today is to find out for yourselves what you can learn from Buddhism. How, then, can the answer be nothing? How can both answers be right? If both answers are correct, would it not be the same as saying What I Learned About Buddhism nothing is not different from many things, or that none is identical with many, or that zero is equal to any number?
How could this be? The answer depends on the level on which we communicate with each other.
In Buddhism we say that there are three general levels of communication: the enlightened level, the intellectual level, and the common level. First, let me make it clear that I have not become enlightened.
Post navigation
As in the story of the mother frog and her tadpole, I am only the tadpole who has not yet developed legs and who is still waterbound, lacking the actual experience of the warm What I Learned About Buddhism or the gentle breeze that the mother frog has experienced on the bank of the pond. In Buddhist literature one encounters many such statements.
For example, the Hear Sutra says that matter or form is not different from emptiness and emptiness is identical with matter. In many other sutras, Buddha teaches that all the phenomena in the universe are identical with emptiness and emptiness is identical with phenomena. Since you and I are also part of the phenomena of the world, you and I are identical with emptiness and emptiness is identical with us both.
Can you understand and appreciate this statement? Are you directly experiencing it and not merely intellectually accepting or knowing it? If your answer is affirmative, I congratulate you and accord you much respect. Since you realize that you are identical with emptiness, you can appreciate that the question of what you can learn from Buddhism is meaningless. You, the subject, are empty.
Buddhism, the object, is also empty, since Buddhism is also part of phenomena. Since both subject and object are empty, the action of learning is superfluous. So, both answers? To say both are either correct or incorrect is irrelevant. They are just like the noises made by a baby or the sound of the wind. It is important to note that if you truly experience identification with emptiness, no suffering can affect you, for where is your body to receive pain?]
And indefinitely it is not far :)
Excuse, that I interrupt you, but, in my opinion, there is other way of the decision of a question.
I can believe to you :)