As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it. Lanza, Romer, Paul M, Paul Romer, Paul M Romer, Goulder, Lawrence H. Alan S. Richels, Discussion Papers.
Bjart J. Alfsen, Bernard, A. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
Site Index
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact:. If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage Efffect to do it here. This allows Tye link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about. If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form. If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation. Please note that corrections The Kyoto Protocol And Its Effect On take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services. Economic literature: papersarticlessoftwarechaptersbooks.
FRED data.
Coronavirus Vaccine Tracker
Registered: Carlo Carraro. The US decision not to ratify the Kyoto Protocol and the recent outcomes of the Bonn and Marrakech Conferences of the Parties has important implications for both the effectiveness and the efficiency of future climate policies. Among these implications, those related with technical change and with the functioning of the international market for carbon emissions are particularly relevant, because these variables have the largest impact on the overall abatement cost to be born by Annex B countries in the short and in the long run.
A first goal is to assess the impact of the US defection on the price of permits and compliance costs when technological innovation and diffusion is taken into account the model embodies international technological spillovers. A second goal is to understand for what reasons in the presence of endogenous and induced technical change the reduction of the price of permits is lower than in most empirical analyses recently Ane.
A third goal is to assess the role of Russia in climate negotiations, its increased bargaining power and its eventual incentives to follow the US defections.]
I consider, that you are not right. I am assured. I can prove it. Write to me in PM, we will talk.
I am final, I am sorry, but it is necessary for me little bit more information.
I can recommend to visit to you a site on which there are many articles on a theme interesting you.
Yes, I understand you. In it something is also to me it seems it is very excellent thought. Completely with you I will agree.