The Ethical Decision Making Knowledge Video
Unit 1 - Ethical Decision Making Assignment OverviewThe Ethical Decision Making Knowledge - useful
The purpose of this assignment is to develop the ability to apply professional values, codes of ethics, and a decision-making model to the process of ethical decision making. Your paper must be in current APA format including title page and reference page. The body of your paper must be 6—9 pages and include at least 6 references. Your paper must be well-thought-out and demonstrate critical thinking. Read and analyze the chosen scenario. Approach the scenario as if it has already happened and now you must address the problems the scenario has created. In other words, as in much of real life and practice, you must now do damage control. The Ethical Decision Making Knowledge.
I never have. The allegations ended, but not the way Perot intended. Within hours, irrefutable evidence appeared that proved Perot had hired others to probe his people's pasts. By the next day, there was no question on anyone's mind: Ross Perot lied. So what?
It wasn't the first time a politician lied and it won't be The Ethical Decision Making Knowledge last. Sometimes a lie, a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive, seems the perfect response: a brother lies about his sister's where-abouts to the drunken husband threatening to harm her, a doctor tells a depressed patient that he has a chance of long-term recovery when she is confident he'll live only six months, a son gives his late mother's estate to the poor after promising to honor her demand that the money be placed in her coffin.
When trying to do the right thing in a difficult situation, perfect honesty may seem second best next to values like compassion, respect, and justice. Yet many philosophical and religious traditions have long claimed that rarely, if ever, is a lie permissible. What, then, is the truth about lying? The philosopher Immanuel Kant said that lying was always Decisino wrong. He argued that all persons are Ethocal with an "intrinsic worth" that he called human dignity. This dignity derives from the fact that humans are uniquely rational agents, capable of freely making their own decisions, setting their own goals, and guiding their conduct by reason.
To be human, said Kant, is to have the rational power of free https://amazonia.fiocruz.br/scdp/essay/essay-writing-format-cbse-class-12/cell-phones-and-its-effect-on-society.php to be ethical, he continued, is to respect that power in oneself and others. Lies are The Ethical Decision Making Knowledge wrong, then, for two reasons. First, lying corrupts the most important quality Makimg my being human: my ability to make free, rational choices.
SAFE AND SECURE PURCHASE
Each lie I tell contradicts the part of me that gives me moral worth. Second, my lies rob others of their freedom to choose rationally. When my lie leads people to decide other than they would had they known the truth, I have harmed their human dignity and autonomy.
Kant believed that to value ourselves and others as ends instead of means, we have perfect duties i. A second perspective, virtue ethics, The Ethical Decision Making Knowledge maintains that lying is morally wrong, though less strictly than Kant. Rather than judge right or wrong behavior on the basis of reason and what people should or should not do, virtue ethicists focus on the development of character or what people should be.
Virtues are desirable qualities of persons that predispose them to act in a certain manner. Fairness, for example, is a virtue we may choose to strive toward in pursuit of fulfilling our human potential. In virtue ethics, to be virtuous is Makin be ethical. Though the nature of virtue ethics makes it difficult to assess the morality of individual acts, The Ethical Decision Making Knowledge Ethhical advocate this theory generally consider lying wrong because it opposes the virtue of honesty.
There is some debate whether a Makiny told in pursuit of another virtue e. This apparent conflict between virtues is managed by most ethicists through a concept called the unity of the virtues. This doctrine states that the virtuous person, the ideal person we continuously strive to be, cannot achieve one virtue without achieving them all. Therefore, when facing a seeming conflict between virtues, such as a compassionate lie, virtue ethics charges us to imagine what some ideal individual would do and act accordingly, thus making the ideal person's virtues one's own.
In Pollution Pollution Water, virtue ethics finds lying immoral when it is a step away, not toward, the process of becoming the best persons we can be. According to a third perspective, utilitarian ethics, Kant and virtue ethicists ignore the only test necessary for judging the morality of a lie - balancing the benefits and harms of its consequences.
SMART STUDENTS ARE HERE
Utilitarians base their reasoning on the claim that actions, including lying, are morally acceptable when the resulting consequences maximize benefit or minimize harm. A lie, therefore, is not always immoral; in fact, when lying is necessary to maximize benefit or minimize harm, it may be immoral not to lie.
The challenge in applying utilitarian ethics to everyday decision making, however, is significant: one must correctly estimate the overall consequences of one's actions before making a decision.]
One thought on “The Ethical Decision Making Knowledge”