Arend Lipjhart s Majoritarian Model Of Democracy - amazonia.fiocruz.br

Arend Lipjhart s Majoritarian Model Of Democracy Video

Arend Lijphart is one of the most cited and most influential political scientists in the world.

He grew up in the Netherlands, and after his high school exams he went to the United States to go to college, which was not common in the s. In he returned to the Netherlands where he worked at Leiden University. In he came back to the United States, and since then he Arend Lipjhart s Majoritarian Model Of Democracy lived and worked in California, now as research professor emeritus in political science. His work has been important, not just in the academic world i. He regularly advised various parties in divided societies, such as in Northern Ireland and South Africa.

Around 20 years ago, I met him for the first time, when he received an honorary doctorate at Leiden University. We started talking about his work and my own research interests. He had read my article on waves of democratization, and wanted to serve as external examiner in my PhD committee later that year. Since then we have kept in touch, communicating about politics, Essay On Speech about democracy and freedom.

Never about religion.

However, I have not been a Christian Scientist anymore for quite some time! This message came out of the blue for me: I had heard of the Christian Scientists, but I was surprised that Arend Lijphart had been a member of this group.

Ireland Fits Well Into Arend Lijphart 's Consensus Model Of Democracy Essay

Strange actually, because religion certainly does play a role in his academic work. Today about American politics, Dutch pillarization and divided societies. Reactions are welcome under the original version of the interview, Demoocracy is in Dutch, click here. Next week: about religion and the Christian Scientists. And it is also a pity that the Democrats have not done well in the elections of the Senate and the House of Representatives.

Review Article: Divided Societies and Deliberative Democracy

Progressive America can be found in the urban areas and coastal cities. Both groups feel threatened by the other. There is a lot of polarization. The progressive and conservative Americans are increasingly living in their own parallel worlds. On the other hand, polarization in society does not automatically mean political conflict. A divided society can be held together and it does not necessarily lead to instability. Like in the Netherlands, which was a stable democracy with strong societal divisions?

Until the s, the country was divided into different groups. Catholics voted for KVP which was the catholic political party, read the catholic newspapers, listened to the catholic radio programmes, sent their children to a Catholic school, played football at the Catholic football club, and bought bread from the Catholic bakery. The same was true of the Protestants, Liberals and Social Democrats. Dmocracy pillars lived next to each other, not mixed with each other. People from one pillar did not come into contact with people from the other pillar. The Netherlands consisted of separate worlds: a divided society.

Onderzoeker/ Schrijver/ Docent

While studying in the United States, I started to think about it in the s and s. According to American political scientists at the time, it was very unlikely that societial divisions would lead to a stable functioning democracy. At Yale University, my supervisor was Gabriel Almond.]