Violence Theory And Gender Role Theory - amazonia.fiocruz.br

Violence Theory And Gender Role Theory - accept

The lowest-priced brand-new, unused, unopened, undamaged item in its original packaging where packaging is applicable. Packaging should be the same as what is found in a retail store, unless the item is handmade or was packaged by the manufacturer in non-retail packaging, such as an unprinted box or plastic bag. See details for additional description. Skip to main content. Murphy , Trade Paperback. Murphy , Trade Paperback Be the first to write a review. About this product. Stock photo. Brand new: Lowest price The lowest-priced brand-new, unused, unopened, undamaged item in its original packaging where packaging is applicable. Buy It Now. Violence Theory And Gender Role Theory

Angela Hattery and Earl Smith's Gender, Power, and Violence: Responding to Sexual and Intimate Partner Violence in Society Today takes an institutional perspective in analyzing sexual violence in the United Go here, the mechanisms that Violence Theory And Gender Role Theory it, and the potential solutions to reduce its prevalence. The authors Violence Theory And Gender Role Theory out a clear theoretical orientation, identifying broad patterns of institutional characteristics that allow gender-based violence, Rloe diving into specific institutional cases and instances that exemplify their theory. Their work provides an insightful analysis of modern institutions, such as Fraternities, the Military, and Prisons, and why and how these and other institutions continue to operate under gendered power structures and subsequently perpetuate gender-based violence utilizing a variety of past research including case studies and ethnographies.

Following the MeToo movement in recent years, and the subsequent social focus on Hollywood concerning gender-based violence, the timing of this publication in the United States is critical as it relates to the social context, addressing the phenomena of gender-based violence across a wide variety of institutions within the country. Hattery and Smith also grapple with the broader social context by highlighting the heightened levels of Violejce incarceration in the United States and how it interacts with the phenomena of sexual violence both directly and punitively.

Shop by category

The authors claim how and why institutions perpetuate violence against women, providing a broad and clear theoretical orientation. Citing Goffman's Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmatesthe authors emphasize the concept of VViolence total institution and the quasi-total institution in enforcing hierarchies and controlling patterns of behavior broadly, in doing so, diving Violenve the very dynamics that perpetuate gender-based violence within the United States in particular, such as how particular hypermasculine cultures are maintained within institutions as well https://amazonia.fiocruz.br/scdp/blog/woman-in-black-character-quotes/determinism-between-free-will-and-determinism.php where and who maintains power over institutions.

While substantial work has been done on specific institutions and how gender-based violence persists within them, this work is seminal in merging these many institutional cases which have been well-researched empirically, into a broad framework pertinent to Violence Theory And Gender Role Theory gender-based violence is enabled within the United States by some of the most influential American Institutions. The book should additionally be praised for presenting such an in-depth organization of modern research on sexual violence. Ultimately, the novel framework they create may be especially useful in the future examination of less-studied institutions and institutions outside of the United States.

The authors further build on their institutional framework by identifying four broad patterns of American institutional dynamics that enable gender-based violence within the United States, examining Segregated Genders, Hypermasculinity, Resistance to Integration, and Segregation in Leadership. The authors articulate how these tendencies uphold gender-based power structures within institutions and encourage toxically masculine cultures to flourish.

FROM THE HOMEPAGE

In all cases, they Violence Theory And Gender Role Theory on a wide variety of evidence both in form and example in supporting their claims and conducting each of their institution-specific analyses. They repeatedly emphasize broad notions of the need for offenders to be Tyeory accountable more often, to more greatly deter behavior as well as rehabilitate offenders, and eliminate chronic re-offending, emphasizing the need for institutional culture to change, offering tailored solutions for specific institutions, such as suggesting in Chapter Six that misconduct by athletes should no longer be handled internally by universities or sports organizations, as they traditionally have been in the United States. The authors, Angela Hattery, a professor of Women and Gender Studies, and Earl Smith, a sociology and American ethnic studies professor, contribute a broad yet powerfully nuanced array of knowledge in this work.

Hattery and Smith do an excellent job of keeping their analyses of specific American institutions grounded in the theory they present at the beginning of the book. They explicitly identify what type of institution they believe each case study to be, explaining their logic and offering concise evidence into how that institutional type plays a role in how that particular institution uniquely Tueory sexual violence.

Book Review ARTICLE

They further apply their four-pattern framework to deeply examine how their institutional patterns play a specific but generalizable role in how different institutions perpetuate sexual violence distinctly. Another excellent piece of Hattery and Smith's work is dealing with the delicate issue of how to Genver the accountability of sexual violence offenders in an era of excessive mass incarceration in the United States, laying out a clear and explicit approach that delicately satisfies a seemingly unsolvable social problem.

Of see more, though, Hattery and Smith suggest that incarceration should not be the solution for dealing with perpetrators of sexual violence, as it traditionally is in the United States.]