Oppression Of Women In The 14th Century - amazonia.fiocruz.br

Oppression Of Women In The 14th Century Video

Opinion: Oppression Of Women In The 14th Century

An attempt to synthesise the results of discussions held between the 3rd and 8th July, This report was published in the Bulletin of link Communist PlatformNo. It therefore involves some selectiveness in what is reported and what is not, which undoubtedly was influenced by our own standpoint.

Site Navigation

We may not now agree with every word we wrote then, but looking back WWomen it after a period of more than 40 years, one thing that strikes us is our prescience in identifying sexual assault as a major issue, and in attempting to accommodate it within a revolutionary socialist perspective. Autonomous feminist groups were formed and Wlmen in protest up and down the country, and they continued to organise on various issues, particularly violence against women, with large-scale protest actions, sustained campaigns in support of victims, demands for legal action against perpetrators, and proposals for reformulation of patriarchal laws. These groups were broadly socialist, but independent of political parties, including left parties.

However, this mass upsurge of women after the Supreme Court decision in the Mathura rape Oppression Of Women In The 14th Century also showed how short-sighted we had been at the time of our workshops in opining that large-scale feminist struggles might not arise in India. Secondly, we can identify an intersectional analysis although of course we did not use the wordwhich sees gender and class oppression under capitalism as coming from different roots and producing a form of oppression of proletarian women that was different from the oppression of working-class men as well as upper-class women.

This also entailed going beyond the liberal, existentialist and radical feminist theories circulating at that time. In exploring the difference between bourgeois feminism and proletarian feminism, we discussed the issue of unwaged domestic labour and the daily and generational reproduction of the labour force, linking it with the reproduction of the capitalist system as a whole.

The idea that men should share domestic labour so that more women can participate in 14t has been almost mainstreamed now, but the redistribution of resources to deal with class inequalities is not on the agenda.

On the contrary, the effects of economic crisis for working-class women includes hidden costs in the form of an increase in the time spent in invisible labour: a reproductive tax paid by working-class women to sustain households in the face of cuts to the public sector, privatisation of public services, and macro-economic policies based on the assumption that the time women spend to sustain their families and the economy is infinitely elastic.

The commodification of biological reproduction through the emergence of global birth markets and the renting out of wombs by poor women in the South raises further questions for a socialist-feminist perspective.

Want to add to the discussion?

The question of what goes on in working-class households continues to be a matter of debate among Marxists, with some still holding that it is only a site of individual consumption and not of production, others holding that there is production of use-values but not of exchange-value within such households, and yet others arguing that both use-values and exchange-value are produced in them. We also tried to understand the complexity of Oppression Of Women In The 14th Century struggle of proletarian women trying to preserve a concern for personal relationships of mutual recognition and love, and how this needs to become a part of the working-class struggle rather than being seen as contradicting it.

This makes it all the more Oppgession to bring back and broaden the question we tried to tackle when we examined the interaction between class and gender. With right-wing ideologies relentlessly gaining strength, the need to identify the linkages as well as the contradictions between capitalism, patriarchy, heteronormativity, and caste and ethno-religious dominance becomes imperative. Many of the issues we identified as requiring further research and analysis were ones we worked Centjry in the following years and decades. In that sense, these workshops can be seen as setting out an agenda. Amrita Chhachhi and Rohini Hensman, September What is a revolutionary perspective for women?

This is a question which communists have by and large evaded in one way or another. The most common mode of evasion is to say that the oppression of women is inevitable in capitalist society and can only be abolished when article source society is overthrown. The conclusion: all efforts must be directed towards the overthrow of capitalist society, and women must be drawn into this effort wherever Oppressoon, or at least prevented from hindering it.

Why this is an evasion is that it ignores the way in which the oppression of women is itself an obstacle to the overthrow of capitalism and why, therefore, a struggle against this oppression is an integral part of the struggle against capitalism.

Navigation menu

If the latter standpoint is accepted, then the elaboration of a revolutionary perspective for women can be seen to be a necessary task of communists. These discussions were an attempt to begin this task. To this end, certain fundamental questions were identified and sought to be answered: What are the roots of the oppression of women? What form does this oppression take in capitalist society? What movements have arisen in opposition to it, and what is the ideal tendency of these movements? What specific form does the oppression of women take in India? Thr any movements arisen in opposition to it, and if so, what is their nature? It is out of the answers to these questions that the elements of a perspective would emerge.]