Three Forms Of Semiotics - amazonia.fiocruz.br

Three Forms Of Semiotics Video

Navigation menu

These two models are often presented Three Forms Of Semiotics mutually exclusive and counterposed. Semioitcs, in linking past with present, and when connecting different spaces and generations, memory is always the result of circulation flow as well as of local semiotic conditions of production and use containment. The aim of this article is, then, to provide an interpretative theory of memory, and to identify and describe the methodological tools capable of implementing such an approach. The memory of the former Italian concentration camp of Fossoli will serve as an exemplary and illustrative case study. Memory lives in its more or less provisional, semiotic materializations: texts, Semiotica, images, music, performances, rituals and daily interactions and practices.

Its condition Three Forms Of Semiotics existence lies both in its capacity to take a recognizable cultural form within a given context and to break away from that very context, in order to be transmitted across time, space and generations.

1 Introduction

Hence, when analyzing memory, we are asked to acknowledge its puzzling nature: memory is always localized and always displacing, living in its transmission from one context to another, between local mise en forme and movement. However, within the multidisciplinary field of memory studies, remembering and forgetting have been examined through two methodological and epistemological models, which have been presented as counterposed or mutually exclusive: containment and flow. Contributing to a growing scholarship and discussion in the field of memory studies, this article argues for an integrated approach, capable of describing remembering and forgetting both as movement and form. In the s, Eco looked back at his own interpretative and encyclopedic theory, envisioning it also as a model for analysing and studying cultures in terms of memory-making. In so doing, he developed a perspective that is consistent with a line of investigation Three Forms Of Semiotics Lotman inaugurated back in the s.

Likewise, a semiotic perspective applied to memory does not aim to study Forma past per sebut the n possible versions and interpretations of the past that we can locally identify, and their mutual relationships. These versions can be either consistent or conflicting and contradictory, co-existent or successive, drawing on different semiotic substances images, verbal and oral, rituals, etc.

I will develop my argument in three steps.

Post navigation

First, I will describe the genealogy and the semiotic characteristics underpinning the memory-as-flow and memory-as-containment models. Third, I will describe an Thrde case study, capable of showing how memory-as-flow and memory-as-containment can be click together, in a combined analysis of remembering and forgetting.

The case study deals with the memory of the former concentration camp of Fossoli, an Italian location that served different functions between the s and the s. The latter argued that, prior to the fifteenth Three Forms Of Semiotics, in a world dominated by orality, culture and media initially worked through connections. Subsequently, after the rise of the printing press and up to the era of digital media, media environments were dominated by the model of containment, because memory was conceptualized as being contained within the boundaries of printed texts or television screens.

Finally, in the world we currently inhabit, which is Three Forms Of Semiotics by digital media, we have returned to the connection model. Indeed, the contraposition between flow and Semioticss is to be understood at a methodological and epistemological level.

Components of representation

However, rather than to focus on the media and discursive practices in which his companions have specialised painting, historiography, architecture, etc. Indeed, what is at stake in the contraposition between flow and containment is not the history or the ontology of memory and media, as Hoskins argues, but rather, the division of labour between disciplines, and the ways in which they enact their objects of analysis through specific methods of analysis.

Memory studies is a multidisciplinary field of research, whose practitioners have originally been trained within their own disciplines, and who have often specialized in specific media, and in medium-specific methods of analysis.]