Ontological Arguments The Ontological Argument - amazonia.fiocruz.br

Ontological Arguments The Ontological Argument - remarkable, and

I will begin my paper by discussing the two major versions of the ontological argument by Anselm presented in the proslogion. One should start off with the first summarized in the standard form as follows: 1 It is a conceptual truth that God is a being than which none greater can be imagined. The arguments attempt to prove God's existence from the meaning of the word God. The ontological argument was introduced by Anselm of Canterbury in his book Proslogion. Anselm's classical argument was based on two principals and the two most involved in this is St Anselm of Canterbury as previously mentioned and Rene Descartes. The ontological argument argues that. Although in order to move forward, failed arguments must be studied to ensure that mistakes are not repeated. One such argument is the Ontological Argument. This argument was first recorded by St. Anslem Ontological Arguments The Ontological Argument

Essay on The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God

I used to study philosophy. In a class on the philosophy of religion, we studied several arguments for the existence of God. One that I could never get into was proposed by St. Anselm of Canterbury in and became known as the ontological argument.

My professor set it to the tune of Waltzing Matilda. One of the verses, as I recall, went like this:. Which is to say, Anselm defined God as the greatest being that could be conceived. From this he reasoned that if you had another being that was like God in every way but lacked the attribute of existence, then you could conceive of an identical being who did have the attribute of existence. The second being would be greater than the first.

Ergo, God exists. I was happy to more info that Thomas Aquinas skipped this particular argument in his Summa Theologica a century later. And then, inImmanuel Kant drove a stake through its heart. Insisting that being Ontological Arguments The Ontological Argument not an attribute of a concept at all, Kant pointed out that if you had a real sauerbraten and an imaginary sauerbraten, and they both looked and smelled and tasted the same, then there was absolutely no conceptual difference between them. After the exam, I tucked this esoteric knowledge away until the early Nineties, when the company that employed me became enamored of the quality movement and reengineering. We spent the better part of a year delineating our Ojtological, scrutinizing them, and seeing where we could improve them.

Then we would reengineer those that could be improved. For some reason, the ontological argument popped into my head again. She grunted, as I recall, and suggested that we get back to work.

The Ontological Argument By Anselm

They were changed sometimes, but they were never systematically evaluated. Having standards applied made them quality processes. In a slightly different sense, software has always been evaluated, but only to satisfy internal QA departments. Only software that does is usable software. The reason the quality movement became prominent in the early Nineties is that standards began to be applied.

The reason the usability movement became prominent in the late Nineties is that standards changed. And while Anselm may have regarded Ontklogical argument as unquestionable, Ontological Arguments The Ontological Argument one is likely to say that about usability standards in the near future. Share This. Latest Posts.]