Contract Law Is A Legal Agreement - amazonia.fiocruz.br

Contract Law Is A Legal Agreement Video

In economicscontract theory studies how economic actors can and do construct contractual arrangements, generally in the presence of information asymmetry. Because of its connections with both agency and incentivescontract theory is often categorized within a field known as Law and economics. One prominent application of it is the design of optimal schemes of managerial compensation.

In the field of economics, the first formal treatment of this topic was given by Kenneth Arrow in the s. InOliver Hart and Bengt R. A standard practice in the microeconomics of contract theory is to represent the behaviour of a decision maker under certain numerical utility structures, and then apply an optimization algorithm to identify optimal decisions.

Such a procedure has been used Contract Law Is A Legal Agreement the contract theory framework to several typical situations, labeled moral hazardadverse selection and signalling. The spirit of Contract Law Is A Legal Agreement models lies in finding theoretical ways to motivate agents to take appropriate actions, even under an insurance contract.

The main results achieved through this family of models involve: mathematical properties of the utility structure of the principal and the agent, relaxation of assumptions, and variations of the time structure of the contract relationship, among others. It is customary to model people as maximizers of some von Neumann—Morgenstern click at this page functionsas stated by expected utility theory. Performance-based contracts that depend on observable and verifiable output can often be employed to create incentives for the agent to act in the principal's interest.

When agents are risk-averse, however, such contracts are generally only second-best because incentivization precludes full insurance. If the agent is risk-neutral and there are no bounds on transfer payments, the fact that the agent's effort is unobservable i.

Get a Quote Today.

In this case, the same outcome can be achieved that would be attained with verifiable effort: The agent chooses the so-called "first-best" effort level that maximizes the expected total surplus of the two parties. Specifically, the principal can give the realized output to the agent, but let the agent make a fixed up-front payment. The agent is then a "residual claimant" and will maximize the expected total surplus minus the fixed payment.

Hence, the first-best effort level maximizes the agent's payoff, and the fixed https://amazonia.fiocruz.br/scdp/blog/purpose-of-case-study-in-psychology/the-death-penalty-is-it-really-justice.php can be chosen such that in equilibrium the agent's expected payoff equals his or her reservation utility which is what the agent would get if no contract was written. Yet, if the agent is risk-averse, there is a trade-off between incentives and insurance. Moreover, if the agent is risk-neutral but wealth-constrained, the agent cannot make the fixed up-front payment to the principal, so the principal must leave a "limited liability rent" to the agent i. The moral hazard model with risk aversion was pioneered by Steven Shavell, Sanford J.

GrossmanOliver D.

US Sections

Hartand others in the s and s. A study on the solution to moral hazard concludes that Contract Law Is A Legal Agreement moral sensitivity to the principal-agent model increases its descriptiveness, prescriptiveness, and pedagogical usefulness because it induces employees to work at the appropriate effort for which they receive a wage. The theory suggests that as employee work efforts increase, so proportional premium wage should increases also to encourage productivity. In adverse selection models, the principal is not informed about a certain characteristic of the agent at the time the contract is written.

The characteristic is called the agent's "type". For example, health insurance is more likely to be purchased by people who are more likely to get sick. In this case, the agent's type is his or her health status, which is privately known by the agent.

Another prominent example is public procurement contracting: The government agency the principal does not know the private firm's cost.]