Was Napoleon Bonaparte a Hero or a - amazonia.fiocruz.br

Was Napoleon Bonaparte a Hero or a Video

Napoleon Bonaparte: The Strategic Genius Was Napoleon Bonaparte a Hero or a

Was Napoleon Bonaparte a Hero or a - apologise

We will use your email address only for sending you newsletters. Please see our Privacy Notice for details of your data protection rights. Napoleon was arguably the greatest general in history. The story goes that after Napoleon died in , Dr Francois Antommarchi concluded the autopsy by removing his penis. The penis, which was not properly preserved, has been compared over the years to a piece of leather, a shriveled eel and even beef jerky. Britain and France were the two great powers of the age, the former with its booming industrial economy and world-leading navy and the latter with its intellectual superiority in the form of Enlightenment thinking. And before , with French armies running rampant across Europe, the threat of a Napoleonic invasion of Britain was very real. Just as Adolf Hitler was before and after World War 2 , Napoleon was the butt of jokes, cartoons, games and political point-scoring. British cartoonists such as James Gillray often mocked him, depicting him dwarfed by a cocked hat. Like the fate of his penis, the myth of his short stature was solidified by a mistranslation.

Was Napoleon Bonaparte a hero or tyrant? Till this day I have not found someone who can give me an accurate answer. A Wqs blooded Corscian, Napoleon was a very adept military leader and politician. He manipulated his minor position in the French Army during the Revolution so he rapidly gained influence, and he eventually became the General of the Grande Armee second e has an accent mark. Napoleon ruled with an iron fist and managed to conquer large tracts of Europe and Africa, as well as Haiti and other areas in the Americas.

Follow Us:

Because of him, the US now has the former Louisiana Territory, which helped us become who we are today. That's a good thing, but Napoleon didn't Ws it because of US-French relations at the time very shaky because of French privateers attacking American shipping. Napoleon did it to finance his wars with the rest of the world. Napoleon was very smart militarily but prone to arrogance and cruelty.

His Siberian campaign left his soldiers eating hunks of frozen raw meat from horses some still alive-- the soldiers would slice off meat from the haunches of a moving horse in front of them Before battles he would leave candles on in his tent as to make his soldiers think he was planning--in actuallity he slept or read books. Napoleon Bonaparte died in exile after the aftermath of Waterloo and other failed attempts to regain power. His legacy was not for a noble cause but for personal and national greed and ambition.

Thus, he cannot be a hero. Heros act for noble and good ideas. You're never going to get an accurate answer because the question demands a subjective answer.

Its how he ended up that matter; Goethe once said about him' Napoleon wanted Virtue. She was not to be hadso he got Power instead. But for a really great story about the cult of his mystique, read "The Duel" by Jospeh Conrad.

Analysis Of The Farewell Of Telemachus And Eucharis

It concerend a a pair of officers who survived his Russian campaign and the transition to post Napoleonic France. He may have started out heroicly, and ended as a tyrant, but his cult persisted in the minds of thousands who followed him unquestioningly. Its interesting that in the Balikins, he built roads, crated orr systems and generally improved the administration of local government, but In Spain, his forces were barbaric. His conquest of Spain led to the independance of former colonies in the Americas from Chile to Mexico.

site categories

He ended up as a tyrant that wasted vast ammounts of men on ill stared militry campaigns from Egypt to Waterloo. Napoleon was instrumental in reforming the laws and education of France He stopped the insanity of the deaths from the French Revolution. Unfortunately he was a tyrant because he thought he could rule Europe and give his entire family thrones. He wrote up a pretty good code of laws and liberated a lot of people living under absolute monarchs, but aWs crowned himself emperor and kind of ignored his own laws when he felt like it This should be in the history section. IMHO he was a hero, but I'm sure many poeple view him as tyrant. And anyone who got rid of royalty as an actual political force https://amazonia.fiocruz.br/scdp/blog/story-in-italian/dependency-theory-and-world-systems-theory-can.php over mainland Europe can't be all bad.

Depends on which side you're on]