Literature Review on Training and Development - amazonia.fiocruz.br

More about this item Keywords literature review ; review of reviews ; typology ; vocational education and training ; VET ; Statistics Access and download statistics Corrections All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors.

You can help correct errors and omissions.

Speech pathology ceus free

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ijrvet See general information about how to correct material in RePEc. For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics. If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation. Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

Dissertation juridique sur la fin de la vie

Economic literature: papersarticlessoftwarechaptersbooks. FRED data. Umbrella review: Methodological review of reviews published in peer-reviewed journals with a substantial focus on vocational education and training research. We assume that review studies follow the same minimum standards as other research methods: the review must be at least reproducible and thus the results verifiable or falsifiable. So far, however, the review methods used in VET research have not been investigated. Our purpose is to review the review procedures and methods used in published reviews of VET research to identify their current methodological quality.

Approach: To classify the review studies, we initially developed a conceptual framework to distinguish different types of reviews. We then developed a methodological framework to assess the review methods used. Therefore, we did not examine all existing reviews in the field of VET research.

Rather, our specific focus was on a core sector of scientific research: peer-reviewed articles in curated databases.

Job Stress And Organizational Justice For Construction Engineers

Furthermore, we concentrated on the review procedures and methods used, not on the content of the reviews. Findings: We identified nine journals with a substantial VET focus, yielding a total of 1, published articles between andof which only 19 articles 1. Of these 19 reviews, six were excluded from our umbrella review because of unclear methodological procedures. Based on the review typology we developed, five of the remaining 13 reviews were conceptual in nature, four were scoping reviews, three were evidence-oriented, and one was critical in nature.

Public And Private Sector Accounting

None of the reviews examined focused on meta-syntheses, research methods or meta-analyses. In total, this resulted in current review gaps with respect to theory generation meta-synthesispractice of theory elaboration and testing methodological review Traihing the determination of overall effects across single studies meta-analysis.

Finally, our examination of the reviews showed that their scope was mostly clearly presented. However, with regard to the process steps 'data selection' and 'data processing', only a few reviews fully met the requirements of the methodological framework.]