Stanley Milgram s Theory Of Social Psychology Video
Stanley Milgram - Invitation to Social Psychology Stanley Milgram s Theory Of Social PsychologyMilgram: measuring the power of authority and its limits
In Marcha documentary by Christopher Nick titled The game of death has held millions of viewers in France 2. Will a candidate for the game accept, on the order of a scientist, to send increasingly strong electric shocks to another candidate, unknown to himable to lead him to death? What do we learn from this well-known experience in social psychology? That individuals are ready to blindly obey the injunctions Milgam an authority, particularly a scientific one, and thus submit to its will.
Post navigation
A researcher in social psychology at Yale University, Stanley Milgram conducted between and a laboratory experiment whose objective was to assess the influence that a scientist, in other words an expert in his field, can exert on behavior. The final results are published in a landmark book: Obedience to authority An accomplice of Stanley Milgram finds himself in the situation of an individual who Paychology memorize a list https://amazonia.fiocruz.br/scdp/blog/woman-in-black-character-quotes/feminist-counselling-a-feminist-perspective.php word associations.
If he is wrong, he receives from the recruited volunteer an electric shock of course artificialwhich can go up to volts, while a scientist expert in a white coat, also an accomplice, supervises the experiment. The results are terrifying: despite Mulgram pleas of the accomplice imploring the end of the experiment when the feigned pain is unbearable, in two thirds of the cases, the volunteer goes to the end of the experiment, encouraged by the Stanley Milgram s Theory Of Social Psychology expertand inflicts without qualms a shock of volts to the accomplice.
Particularly attention is drawn to variant Concretely, the volunteer is confronted with the totally contradictory points Psycholgy view of two legitimate powers: a first scientist refuses to continue the experiment for ethical reasons the suffering expressed by the accomplicewhile the second scientist maintains that he is necessary to continue it at all costs.
The results obtained are then particularly interesting.
A focus on variant 15
From individuals. It can also help us understand the seditious tendencies of mayors who have authorized by decree the illegal opening of all businesses in their municipality Sovial the more casual, even transgressive behavior observed during this second confinement. It would suffice to convince oneself of the ambient cacophony to stand for three days in front of one of the aforementioned TV channels. The succession of contradictory opinions of medical experts, but also political experts, makes you dizzy and creates extreme confusion given the major disagreements expressed, on the most suitable means of protection, on the vectors of contamination, on the use of some treatments, on the effective implementation continue reading physical distancing, in short on almost everything.
Consequently, the words of the experts were durably contested, and the result could only be an outright rejection of the collective rules of the game. Is a hairdresser who receives clients in drops really an inducer of contagion? Stanley Milgram s Theory Of Social Psychology any case, everyone affirms that they participate little, if at all, in the second wave, reinforced by the critical voice of such Mikgram such a scientist or such self-proclaimed expert. Like the volunteers of the Stanley Milgram experiment who had stopped their participation in the experiment in the presence of two scientists with diametrically opposed opinions. Quoting the exasperation of journalist Laurence Ferrari having cut off a televised debate between doctors on CNews:. This is undoubtedly one of the most emblematic manifestations of the ongoing de-legitimization of scientific discourse, particularly worrying, even dramatic, because opening the way to all populisms and to a relativism elevated to the Stanley Milgram s Theory Of Social Psychology of dogma.
As if, beyond its disastrous economic and social consequences, the Covid pandemic showed us the profound questioning of one of the foundations of democracy, the disputatiothis subtle art of the civilized exchange of arguments and counter-arguments to advance in the same direction. The current questioning concerns the return to a peaceful dialogue based on the admitted legitimacy or not of the expert. Speaking here Staanley legitimacy means referring to an ability to think about speaking while respecting the role assigned to each person, for example on the basis of their recognized skills, taking into account the roles assigned to Others, resulting from their own skills.
This appeal to the intelligence of the judgment has never been so topical, and probably never so difficult to Psycbology in the age of conspiracy and triumphant fake news, including the documentary on Covid released in November Hold-up: return to chaos offers a terrifying mise en abyme. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Psycholohy Milgram: measuring the power of authority and its limits A researcher in social psychology at Yale University, Stanley Milgram conducted between and a laboratory experiment whose objective was to assess the influence that a scientist, in other words an expert in his field, can exert on behavior. The disputatio on borrowed time? Share Article:.]
This valuable opinion
You commit an error. I can defend the position. Write to me in PM, we will talk.