Slavery Southern White Slaveholder Guilt Video
The Slaveowner's View Slavery Southern White Slaveholder Guilt
I have led you through this. I have shown, also, that the aristocratic element, after having identified itself with the system of slavery, acted upon the command of Slavery Southern White Slaveholder Guilt https://amazonia.fiocruz.br/scdp/blog/culture-and-selfaeesteem/managerial-obsolescence.php. Its principal crime consisted at the beginning, and consists to-day, in its identifying itself with slavery instead of yielding to the democratic principles upon which a healthy National organization could be founded.
But remaining faithful Slsveholder slavery, it was impelled by the irresistible power of logic, from step to step, until at last it landed in the domain of high treason. Finding slavery endangered by public opinion, it was natural that it should shut itself up against that dangerous influence.
But being yoked together in a common National organization with the threatening influence of the expansive democratic element, it was natural that it should endeavor to control or suppress it by all the expedients of corruption and intimidation.
Paternalism: Slavery and White Slave Owners
But failing in this finally, and still insisting upon the perpetuation of slavery, it was natural that it should try to shut itself up more effectually—to isolate itself completely, by breaking up the National organization which held it under an influence so dangerous to its existence. Thus slavery, impelled by its necessities from step to step, was the real, the natural traitor against the American nationality, and the Southern people are only the victims of its inevitable treason.
The answer would seem to every unprejudiced Slavery Southern White Slaveholder Guilt as plain as the question. Still, strange as it may appear at first sight, there is a difference of opinion. Only three lines of policy suggest themselves. The most fertile ingenuity could not invent any beyond these three.
Either we must permit the slave aristocracy to isolate itself territorially as well as politically—that is, we must consent to the breaking up of the American nationality; or secondly, we must preserve our Union and nationality by striking down its enemies in arms and by extinguishing the social and political agency which in its nature is disloyal and Guklt or, thirdly, we must invite the slave aristocracy back into the National organization, offering to it that supreme and absolute control of our National concerns without which it cannot insure its permanency in the Union.
Navigation menu
On the first proposition the people have already pronounced their judgment. To accept it was impossible.
The question has been discussed thousands of times; and every enlightened mind, every true American heart, has always arrived at the same conclusion. Considerations of policy, National existence, safety, liberty, civilization, peace, all lead to the same result. It is the instinctive outcry of the deepest convictions, of the immovable religious faith of the American mind. This conviction, this faith, is proclaimed by the thunder of our artillery; it is confirmed by our victories; it is sealed with the blood of the people.
White Slavery in Colonial America
This question is no longer open to discussion. But the conflict between the two other propositions is the real point at issue in our present controversy. It is dust thrown into the eyes of a deluded multitude. They may no longer have the courage Soutehrn say that they are for slavery; they are still base enough to say that they are not against it.]
I apologise, but it does not approach me. Perhaps there are still variants?
It is remarkable, very useful phrase