Reflection On And Comparison Of Religions - amazonia.fiocruz.br

Asian Religions in the USA

Dialectic resembles debatebut the concept excludes subjective elements such as emotional appeal and the modern pejorative sense of rhetoric. Dialectic is alternatively known as minor logicas opposed to Comparisln logic or critique. Within Hegelianismthe word dialectic has the specialised meaning of a contradiction between ideas that serves as the determining factor in their relationship. Dialectic comprises three stages of development : first, the thesisa statement of an idea; second, the antithesisa Reflection On And Comparison Of Religions that contradicts or negates the thesis; and third, the synthesisa statement through which the differences between the two points are resolved. Dialectical materialisma theory or set of theories produced mainly by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engelsadapted the Hegelian dialectic into arguments regarding click materialism.

Dialectic tends to imply a process of evolution https://amazonia.fiocruz.br/scdp/blog/purdue-owl-research-paper/the-1920s-transformations-greatly-affected-the-american.php so does not naturally Reflsction within formal logic see Logic and dialectic.

Data Envelopment Analysis ( Dea )

This process is particularly marked in Hegelian dialectic, and even more so in Marxist dialectic, which may rely on the evolution of ideas over longer time periods in the real world; dialectical logic attempts to address this. There are a variety of meanings of dialectic or dialectics within Western philosophy. The outcome of such a dialectic might be the refutation of a relevant proposition, or of a synthesis, or a combination of the opposing assertions, or a qualitative improvement of the dialogue. Moreover, the source "dialectic" owes much of its prestige to its role in the philosophies of Socrates and Platoin the Greek Classical period 5th to 4th centuries BCE. Aristotle said that it was the pre-Socratic philosopher Zeno of Elea who invented dialectic, of which the dialogues click here Plato are the examples of the Socratic dialectical method.

According to Kanthowever, the ancient Greeks used the Refledtion "dialectic" to signify the logic of false appearance or semblance. To the Ancients, "it was nothing but the logic of illusion. It was a sophistic art of giving to one's ignorance, indeed even to one's intentional tricks, the outward appearance of truth, by imitating the thorough, Onn method which logic always requires, and by using its topic as a cloak for every empty assertion. The Socratic dialogues are a particular form Reflection On And Comparison Of Religions dialectic known as the Reflection On And Comparison Of Religions of elenchus literally, "refutation, scrutiny" [7] whereby a series of questions clarifies a more precise statement of a vague belief, logical consequences of that statement are explored, and a contradiction is Compqrison.

The method is largely destructive, in that false belief is exposed [8] and only constructive in that this exposure may lead to further search for truth.

Reflectlon The detection of error does not amount to a proof of the antithesis; for example, a contradiction in the consequences of a definition of piety does not provide a correct definition. The principal aim of Socratic activity may be to improve the soul of the interlocutors, by freeing them from unrecognized errors; or indeed, by teaching them the spirit of inquiry. In common cases, Socrates used enthymemes as the foundation of his argument. For example, in the EuthyphroSocrates asks Euthyphro to provide a definition of piety. Euthyphro replies that the pious is that which is loved by the gods.

But, Socrates also has Euthyphro agreeing that the gods are quarrelsome and their quarrels, like human quarrels, concern objects of love or hatred. Therefore, Socrates reasons, at least one thing exists that certain gods love but other gods hate.

Sandro Botticelli, Euthyphro agrees. Socrates concludes that if Euthyphro's definition of piety is acceptable, then there must exist at least one thing that is both pious and impious as it is both loved and hated by the gods —which Euthyphro admits is absurd. Reflectio, Euthyphro is brought to a realization by this dialectical method that his definition of piety is not sufficiently meaningful.

Navigation menu

Because Socrates' ultimate goal was to reach true knowledge, he was even willing to change his own views in order to arrive at the truth. The fundamental goal of dialectic, in this instance, was to establish a precise definition of the subject in this case, rhetoric and with the use of argumentation and questioning, make the subject even more precise.

In the Gorgias, Socrates reaches the truth by asking a series of questions and in return, receiving short, clear answers. There is another interpretation of dialectic, suggested in The Republicas a procedure that is both discursive and intuitive.]