Theoretical And Conceptual Of Computer Science
The quest to understand consciousness, once the purview of philosophers and theologians, is now actively pursued by scientists of many stripes. This paper studies consciousness from the perspective of theoretical computer science.
Recent ACM Journal Launches
We are not looking for a complex model of the brain nor of cognition but for a simple model of the admittedly complex concept of consciousness. We then suggest why the CTM has the feeling of consciousness. The reasonableness of the definitions and explanations can be judged by how well they agree with commonly accepted intuitive Theoretical And Conceptual Of Computer Science of human consciousness, the breadth of related concepts that the model explains easily and naturally, and the extent of its agreement with scientific evidence.
Browse State-of-the-Art. Get the latest machine learning methods with code. Browse our catalogue of tasks and access state-of-the-art solutions. Tip: you can also follow us on Twitter.
An encyclopedia of philosophy articles written by professional philosophers.
You need to log in to edit. You can create a new account if you don't have one. Or, discuss a change on Slack. Official code from paper authors. There is no official implementation. Multiple official implementations.
To add evaluation results you first need to add a task to this paper. Add: Not in the list?
Navigation menu
Create a new task. New task name:. Parent task if any : Description optional :. Create a new method. New method name e.
Search Digital Library
ReLU :. New method full name e. Rectified Linear Unit :.
Paper where method was first introduced : Method category e. Activation Functions : If no match, add something for now then you can add a new category afterwards. Code Edit Add Remove Mark official. No code implementations yet.]
Yes, all is logical
In my opinion you are not right. I am assured. Let's discuss. Write to me in PM.
I can recommend to come on a site on which there is a lot of information on this question.
What useful question
Also that we would do without your excellent phrase