Comparing Karma Reincarnation Rebirth Moksha and Nirvana - amazonia.fiocruz.br

Hopefully, they can be identified through a process of elimination.

The theologian who does not believe that anyone will spend an eternity in Hell after they die. The theologian whose theodicy Compariny the idea that all natural and moral evil result from angels and human beings using their free-will to disobey God and so whether they go to Heaven or Hell is a result of their free choices.

Post navigation

The author of the idea that if God is omniscient then he is responsible Comparing Karma Reincarnation Rebirth Moksha and Nirvana all the evil that goes on in the world. The philosopher who argued that God was not faced with a choice between making us like innocent robots who always do good OR creating us with free-will and the possibility of sinning.

Instead this philosopher claimed that because we sometimes freely choose to do good that God could have created us to always freely choose to do good. Instead, a world where we have a genuine opportunity to inflict real harm on others is the only one that makes any sense as far as our moral development is concerned and that we should have an opportunity to damn ourselves through what we do. The theologian who argued that the universe is like a work of art, a painting that has light and dark aspects and that to think too much about evil is like only seeing the shadows in that painting.

In doing so, we ignore the fact that the universe is ultimately balanced and is the work of a great artist: God. The theologian who can be criticised for not explaining why angels and humans decided to reject God. The theologian who argued that most theodicies can be criticised because they do not sufficiently consider the person who is on the receiving end of extreme and seemingly undeserved suffering. The author of the idea that no plan that God has in mind for humanity can justify the suffering of innocent children presumably even if many of us enjoy an eternal afterlife in heaven.

The theologian who argued that a miracle working God would not help to solve the problem of evil. This is because miracles would compromise the goodness of God. It would be unfair if God helped some people in their suffering but not others. Click here philosopher who agreed that the universe might be the product of a benevolent Comparing Karma Reincarnation Rebirth Moksha and Nirvana but thought that it was more likely to have originated from a source that is neither good nor evil, given the relative Comparing Karma Reincarnation Rebirth Moksha and Nirvana of the world and the mixture of both that can be found in it.

The idea that God is Himself subject to the laws of nature and so cannot perform miracles is associated with:. It therefore seems strange to think of them as being somehow morally accountable for their actions. They are not limited to one person. Finally, the explanation for why we suffer seems endlessly deferred because it is always explained in terms of a previous life, or the one before that, and so on. Apart from philosophical problems with the idea of reincarnation, there are issues with the evidence for it too. They could, therefore be pseudo-memories. As we do not usually perceive that we are part of an eternal unchanging reality, suffering in life also arises from maya or illusion because it seems to us that death is real and we fear it.

Buddhists, however, are atheists and so there is no problem of evil in Buddhism. For them, dukkha or suffering is just a natural feature of the universe. They also believe that good and bad karma arises from our intentions rather than our actions. Both Hindus and Buddhists believe that living an ethical life and practising lots of meditation frees us from the round of rebirth. However, Buddhism does not teach that we become one with Brahman.

Suggested listening while you take a look around

Instead, all Buddhists are concerned with is putting a stop to suffering, and when this happens we achieve a state called Nirvana. Buddhists also do not believe in the Hindu atman or soul.

A possible strength of the Buddhist and Hindu teaching about evil is that both of these faiths take into account the continue reading of animals and we are encouraged not to harm them. This is a type of suffering that is arguably neglected in both the Reinxarnation and Augustinian theodicies. However, as animals are something we all might have been in our past lives, there is a problem with the law of karma as it could be argued that animals act instinctively. Other problems to do with reincarnation as an explanation for both evil and what we are like in the next world have been identified by Hick. Firstly, it has been argued that memories and personality traits are insufficient as a way of establishing that Person x was person y in a previous life. First of all, memories are shared.

How To Break A Karmic Cycle

And personality traits are too general and also shared by far too many people. And if there was a very first incarnation when we make our debut in the cycle of rebirth, then we might be entitled to an explanation for any suffering we Rebrith in that first life and the law of karma does not seem capable of supplying it. However, Hick has criticised these case studies and has pointed out that they tend to occur in cultures where belief in reincarnation is already widespread. Irenaeus b.]