Climate Change And National Security - amazonia.fiocruz.br

Climate Change And National Security - can

The day Joe Biden becomes president, he can start taking actions that can help slow climate change. The question is whether he can match the magnitude of the challenge. If his administration focuses only on what is politically possible and fails to build a coordinated response that also addresses the social and economic ramifications of both climate change and the U. I have spent much of my career working on responses to climate change internationally and in Washington. I have seen the quiet efforts across political parties, even when the rhetoric was heated. There is room for effective climate actions, particularly as heat waves, wildfires and extreme weather make the risks of global warming tangible and the costs of renewable energy fall. A coordinated strategy will be crucial to go beyond symbolic actions and bring about transformative change. Climate Change And National Security

Climate Change And National Security Video

Why Climate Change Is a Threat to National Security NowThis

Addressing these issues will not just require making traditional national security agencies more climate- and pandemic-aware, but a reimagining of the concept of national security itself. Beyond that, it means bringing more U.

The latest opinion and analysis from NRDC’s science, legal, and policy experts.

There are at least three issues at play. The first is that pandemics and climate change are not the type of threats the U. Pandemic disease and climate change are—in that sense—actorless threats. If North Korea or ISIL managed to kill overAmericans, or set ablaze half the Western United States, you can be sure there would be a response strategy and rhetoric designed to punish those actions and deter future ones.

Still, Climate Change And National Security and climate change are effectively https://amazonia.fiocruz.br/scdp/blog/gregorys-punctuation-checker-tool/david-kolbs-theory-of-learning-theory-analysis.php just that, and as Joia Mukherjee arguesthe inadequacy of a conventional security mindset—to say nothing of policy Natoonal been laid bare.

The nuclear triad, 5 th Fleet, and Seal Team 6 are not useful tools for addressing the primary risks due to climate change or public health crises. The second is the pace and scale of the problem. It also reshaped our entire intelligence apparatus and foreign policy approaches.

Sections menu

But like other slow-onset problems ranging from the obesity epidemic to the chronic underfunding of Social Security, the danger is not in death by a decisive blow, but rather through myriad smaller impacts that challenge the social and economic fabric of the country. The third is a mismatch between the nature of the threats and the agencies tasked with addressing them.

When we think of the national security community, we rarely include agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency, or the Departments of Interior and Cllmate who manage forest fires on public lands.

These organizations are not coordinated with, nor engaged on security discussions as a matter of course. So, what would a reimagined idea of national security look like? Six things could help.

Featured Articles

First, actorless global lCimate like climate and health pandemics need to be a clear priority in the design of foreign policy, in the focus of the intelligence community, and in the missions and structure of the military. Colin Clarke and Louis Klarevas have argued this point forcefullynoting that one large barrier to COVID response has been the failure to clearly identify a strategic goal: zeroing out the coronavirus. Second, re-training, new capabilities, and fundamentally altered budget priorities need to be enacted.

Third, the focus of technology development and force deployment will need to shift toward these global issues, especially as the global energy transition renders traditional national security activities—like patrolling the waters of oil-producing regions—less important. Fourth, detailed collaboration tools and procedures across government between the security apparatus Climate Change And National Security the environmental and public health professionals needs to be put in place. There are real risks to framing climate change and pandemic disease as primarily security issues.

But securitizing these issues is not the same as militarizing them. Fifth, the security focus with a limited view of the benefits of international cooperation needs to change in response to challenges that require collective response.]