The Decision Of Philadelphi The Constitutional Convention - amazonia.fiocruz.br

The Decision Of Philadelphi The Constitutional Convention Video

In the review session held on 11 Novemberthe Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kosovo reviewed the Referrals: 1.

The subject matter of the Referral was the constitutional review of the Decision [Rev. The subject matter of the Referral was the constitutional review of Decision [No.

Navigation menu

The Applicants alleged that these decisions violated their fundamental rights and freedoms, guaranteed by Articles: 31 [Right to Fair and Impartial Trial], 46 [Protection of Property] and [Socially Owned Enterprises and Property] of the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo. In his Referral, the Applicant did not challenge any concrete decision of Consttutional public authority, within the meaning of paragraph 7 of Article [Jurisdiction and Authorized Parties] of the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo.

The subject matter of the Referral was the constitutional review of the Decision [Ac. The Applicant alleged that this Judgment violated his fundamental rights and freedoms guaranteed by Article 31 [Right to Fair and Impartial Trial] of the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo.

The subject matter of the Referral was the constitutional review of the Judgment [PA1. The subject matter of the Referral https://amazonia.fiocruz.br/scdp/blog/purpose-of-case-study-in-psychology/the-significance-of-managerial-capitalism-in-the.php the Decisiob review of the unspecified act of the public authority.

In his Referral, the Applicant has not accurately clarified what fundamental rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo he claims to have been violated by an act of a public authority.

The Referral has no subject matter because the Applicant did not challenge the constitutionality of any act of a public authority in the Republic of Kosovo. The Applicant has not accurately clarified what fundamental rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution have been violated by the challenged decision.

The subject matter of the Referral was the constitutional review of the lack of the court decisions regarding the request for material compensation and reinstatement to work at the University of Prishtina. In his Referral, the Applicant did not challenge any concrete act of a public authority and did not accurately clarify what fundamental rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo he claims to have been violated.

Latest Political Videos

In the submitted Referral, the Applicant has not accurately clarified what fundamental rights and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo she claims to have been violated by an act of a public authority. The Referral was filed by Kadri Berisha from Prishtina, who claims to be the representative of the person D. Source the Referral submitted by the alleged representative, it was alleged that the rights of the person D.

Decisions from the review session held on 11 November Case No.]