Brilliant: The Debate Concerning The Trinity
The Debate Concerning The Trinity | 39 |
DIVERSITY IS THE ESSENCE OF THE WORD | Hotel Rwanda Essay |
The Debate Concerning The Trinity | 356 |
The Debate Concerning The Trinity - opinion you
We have generated them and made them available to aid in search and accessibility to the shows on our network. While we are constantly working to improve the technology and accuracy, we can't respond to requests to fix errors at this time. A previously recorded Netflix show Matt slick. Why is the founder and president of apologetics and research what is found online on board you have questions about Bible doctrine is a Matt Slick Live branches called in responding to your questions at pairs. That's the Christian apologetics research ministry arm daughter works with a lot of information there. Hey, today is voting day voted my wife and out voted she wore a mask to town though we were not turned home when it was pretty efficient so I hope you can vote in the Lord's will be accomplished now have five open lineThe word trinity is derived from the Latin word trinitas, which came from the Platonic term trias meaning three. Thus it is philosophical in origin.
The word trinity was introduced by Tertullian AD who was a pagan turned Catholic theologian and one of the early Church fathers who wrote in the early third century to define the teaching concerning the Godhead. His conclusion was that the Father, Son and Holy Spirit were one substancebut not one in person. He also did not see the Son as Tue co-eternal with the Father.
The Origin of the Trinity Doctrine
The Debate Concerning The Trinity are many unanswered questions about the trinity doctrine and the most obvious is where in the Bible is it explained? Scholars throughout history have acknowledged that it is not found in the Bible. Many will respond that the trinity doctrine is found in 1 John It was about a century after Tertullian when Arianism began causing so many disputes that Constantine convened the first ecumenical Council in Church history to settle them. Arius was an elder in the Alexandrian Church in the early fourth century that taught Christ truly is the begotten Son Thr God and why God is called His Father to state the obvious. A real Father and Son in other words. Opposing the teachings of Arius was Athanasius, a deacon also from Alexandria.
His view was an early form of Trinitarianism where the Father, Son and Holy Tdinity are said to be all the same one god but distinct from more info other making it impossible for them to be a real Father and Son. His view was a further but worsening change to what Tertullian believed with the Holy Spirit not yet claimed to be a literal being. That came later. Mainstream history states Arius taught Christ was created, but the Church burnt what Arius believed and some historians claim they altered records and falsely rumoured that he taught The Debate Concerning The Trinity was created in order to discredit him. The Catholic Church is known for creating false historical records to their interpretation of events to hide the real truth at times. Consider the following for instance.
Navigation menu
The view of Athanasius was highly influenced by Origen who was a Greek philosopher and theologian who reinterpreted Christian doctrine through the philosophy of Neoplatonism. The Debate Concerning The Trinity work was later condemned as unorthodox. Origen taught the doctrine of Purgatory, transubstantiation, transmigration and reincarnation of the soul, the Holy Spirit was a feminine force, Jesus was only a created being, there would be no physical resurrection, the creation account in Genesis is a fictitious story and is known to have publicly castrated himself based on Matthew Arius on the other hand was a pupil of Lucian of Antioch. Lucian was responsible for the work that gave us what is known as the Textus Receptus which was completed by Erasmus, and is what gave us the trusted New Testament of the KJV Bible.]
The matchless theme, is pleasant to me :)
In it something is. Many thanks for the help in this question.
You realize, what have written?
This message, is matchless))), very much it is pleasant to me :)